Comparison Overview

Ralph Lauren

VS

VF Corporation

Ralph Lauren

650 Madison Ave, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Ralph Lauren Corporation (NYSE:RL) is a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of luxury lifestyle products in five categories: apparel, footwear & accessories, home, fragrances and hospitality. For more than 50 years, Ralph Lauren has sought to inspire the dream of a better life through authenticity and timeless style. Its reputation and distinctive image have been developed across a wide range of products, brands, distribution channels and international markets. The Company’s brand names – which include Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren Collection, Ralph Lauren Purple Label, Polo Ralph Lauren, Double RL, Lauren Ralph Lauren, Polo Ralph Lauren Children and Chaps, among others – constitute one of the world’s most widely recognized families of consumer brands.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 20,121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VF Corporation

VF Corporation, Denver, CO, US, 80202
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 0 and 549

VF Corporation is one of the world’s largest apparel, footwear and accessories companies connecting people to the lifestyles, activities and experiences they cherish most through a family of iconic outdoor, active and workwear brands including Vans®, The North Face®, Timberland® and Dickies®. Our purpose is to power movements of sustainable and active lifestyles for the betterment of people and our planet. We believe that when you discover the difference between a career and a calling, you get so much more out of life. When those lines begin to blur, you start to limit yourself much less and start aiming for more. That’s what we want for everyone who joins us at VF. And frankly, that’s what it takes to thrive here too. For more information, please visit vfc.com.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 28,984
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ralph-lauren.jpeg
Ralph Lauren
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ralph Lauren
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VF Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ralph Lauren in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

VF Corporation has 322.54% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Ralph Lauren (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ralph Lauren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VF Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VF Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ralph-lauren.jpeg
Ralph Lauren
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ralph Lauren company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VF Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VF Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ralph Lauren company has not reported any.

In the current year, VF Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Ralph Lauren company.

Neither VF Corporation company nor Ralph Lauren company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

VF Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Ralph Lauren company has not reported such incidents publicly.

VF Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ralph Lauren company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ralph Lauren company nor VF Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ralph Lauren company nor VF Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VF Corporation company employs more people globally than Ralph Lauren company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ralph Lauren nor VF Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H