Comparison Overview

Rakuten Rewards

VS

SLB

Rakuten Rewards

800 Concar Dr, San Mateo, California, US, 94402
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 700 and 749

Since our founding in 1997, Rakuten has helped shape the way people shop online, offering Cash Back, deals and shopping rewards on the world’s largest selection of products and services. To date, our 17M members in the U.S. have earned over $4.6B in Cash Back at their favorite stores. We’re the largest free loyalty program in the US and the first-ever jersey badge sponsor of the Golden State Warriors. Rakuten Rewards is headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area with 12 offices worldwide. Our group of companies includes ShopStyle and Cartera Commerce. Our employees enjoy a fast-paced, friendly environment where creativity and teamwork are valued and results are recognized. Join our team to experience the best of both worlds: a large, profitable, multinational company with the rapid growth and agility of a startup.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 489
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

SLB

5599 San Felipe St, Houston, 77056, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849

We are a technology company that unlocks access to energy for the benefit of all. As innovators, that’s been our mission for nearly a century. Today, we face a global imperative to create a future with more energy, but less carbon. Our diverse, innovative change makers are focused on going further in innovation and inventing the new energy technologies we need to get there.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 78,443
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rakutenrewards.jpeg
Rakuten Rewards
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slbglobal.jpeg
SLB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rakuten Rewards
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SLB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rakuten Rewards in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB in 2025.

Incident History — Rakuten Rewards (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rakuten Rewards cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SLB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rakutenrewards.jpeg
Rakuten Rewards
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slbglobal.jpeg
SLB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SLB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rakuten Rewards company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rakuten Rewards company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SLB company has not reported any.

In the current year, SLB company and Rakuten Rewards company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SLB company nor Rakuten Rewards company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rakuten Rewards company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SLB company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SLB company nor Rakuten Rewards company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rakuten Rewards company nor SLB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SLB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rakuten Rewards company.

SLB company employs more people globally than Rakuten Rewards company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rakuten Rewards nor SLB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N