Comparison Overview

Ragland Automation, Inc.

VS

Scotia Instrumentation Limited

Ragland Automation, Inc.

211 Austin Street, Pickrell, NE, 68422, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We specialize in the design, manufacture, programming and installation of automated control systems including PLC and HMI programming, and custom control panels. Through our process consultation and planning services, we will provide the customer with recommendations on how to best automate an existing process, or integrate and upgrade existing automated systems. When we develop a control system, we provide detailed documentation that includes wiring schematics, process programs, and comprehensive operating instructions. We take pride in providing our customers with a solution that uniquely fits their needs for the most profitable operation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scotia Instrumentation Limited

Campus 1, Aberdeen Science and Technology Park,, Aberdeen, AB22 8GT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Scotia Instrumentation is a specialist calibration, repair, hire & sales organisation providing services across a range of precision instrumentation and test equipment. Calibration & repair is the cornerstone of the company. 18 laboratories include pressure, temperature, electrical, dimensional metrology, dewpoint, humidity, gas, and torque, and are staffed with more than 60 technical specialists ensuring in-house capability is unrivalled. Capability includes UKAS accreditation in electrical, temperature and pressure. Scotia’s hire fleet includes what we believe to be the largest fleet of commissioning test equipment in the UK, over 5000 items available at short notice, for short & long-term rentals. Areas covered include pressure, temperature, electrical, air-hydro pumps, and gas detection. Scotia’s sales business can meet wide ranging requirements from a simple single item through to extensive supply agreements. Scotia represents a range of major instrumentation manufacturers and can also supply its own product ranges. Scotia has also designed and manufactured equipment to service specific customer requirements. The proprietary SDAS data acquisition system, subsea pressure, temperature and logging systems all illustrate this capability. Scotia has UKAS laboratory status in pressure, temperature and electrical disciplines, and assesses or certifies all equipment manufactured, sold, hired or calibrated, as part of its added value service. With this cross section of service, we aim to be a complete provider for instrumentation requirements. Scotia is a privately owned and headquartered in Aberdeen with a regional facility in Newcastle. This year (2025) marks 43 years in business.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ragland-automation-inc-.jpeg
Ragland Automation, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scotia-instrumentation-limited.jpeg
Scotia Instrumentation Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ragland Automation, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scotia Instrumentation Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ragland Automation, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scotia Instrumentation Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Ragland Automation, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ragland Automation, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scotia Instrumentation Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scotia Instrumentation Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ragland-automation-inc-.jpeg
Ragland Automation, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scotia-instrumentation-limited.jpeg
Scotia Instrumentation Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ragland Automation, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scotia Instrumentation Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scotia Instrumentation Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ragland Automation, Inc. company.

In the current year, Scotia Instrumentation Limited company and Ragland Automation, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scotia Instrumentation Limited company nor Ragland Automation, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scotia Instrumentation Limited company nor Ragland Automation, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scotia Instrumentation Limited company nor Ragland Automation, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. company nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. company nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scotia Instrumentation Limited company employs more people globally than Ragland Automation, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ragland Automation, Inc. nor Scotia Instrumentation Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H