Comparison Overview

Radix Law

VS

Top Class Actions

Radix Law

15205 N. Kierland Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85254, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Radix Law is the first multi-lawyer traditional law firm in the United States with a combination of lawyer and non-lawyer owners, more commonly known as an Alternative Business Structure. We are a boutique business law firm that knows the law, helps our clients pursue opportunities and deal with challenges, and we are rooted right here in Arizona. Radix Law has provided outstanding legal advice and advocacy to clients in Arizona and throughout the United States since 2008. Our team of attorneys is highly skilled with more than 100 years of combined legal experience in their respective areas and in-depth knowledge of Arizona business law, bankruptcy, real estate, commercial litigation and estate planning. We believe that relationships are the cornerstone of a good business law firm, and as part of your team, Radix Law provides a one-of-a-kind ability to help you succeed.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Top Class Actions

11201 N Tatum Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85028-6039, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

TopClassActions.com is the #1 source of class action news for consumers and a top lead generator for major law firms across the country. Our 3 million monthly viewers, 900,000 newsletter subscribers and 135,000 Facebook fans submit tens of thousands of mass tort and class action leads a month, and can help push legitimate claims from less than 1% to 10%-25% or more depending on the settlement. If you need potential plaintiffs or claimants, we will find them. Contact us today! 1-855-475-2468 Ext 700 or [email protected]. https://linktr.ee/topclassactions EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Top Class Actions is looking for more awesome individuals to join our amazing team. If you’d like to be considered for one of the following positions, please email your resume and a cover letter to [email protected]. Editor Writer Sales Marketing Social Media

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/radix-law.jpeg
Radix Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topclassactions.com-top-class-actions-llc.jpeg
Top Class Actions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Radix Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Top Class Actions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radix Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Top Class Actions in 2025.

Incident History — Radix Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radix Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Top Class Actions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Top Class Actions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/radix-law.jpeg
Radix Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topclassactions.com-top-class-actions-llc.jpeg
Top Class Actions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Radix Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Top Class Actions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Top Class Actions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Radix Law company.

In the current year, Top Class Actions company and Radix Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Top Class Actions company nor Radix Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Top Class Actions company nor Radix Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Top Class Actions company nor Radix Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Radix Law company nor Top Class Actions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Radix Law company nor Top Class Actions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Top Class Actions company employs more people globally than Radix Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Radix Law nor Top Class Actions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X