Comparison Overview

Rackapps

VS

Advantech Brasil

Rackapps

48761 Kato Road, Fremont, California, 94538, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

RackApps partners with Software companies and mutually develops optimum appliances (Apps). The design of the bare metal works around the efficiency of performance, price, global support, and power usage. Rackapps is the data-center/office Appliance manufacturing division of ASA Computers. At Rackapps, we have assembled a team of Software and hardware engineers to make life simpler for people who buy specialty software for use in their daily work environment. We take “off the shelf parts” and make a branded appliance. This enables the apps to be easily upgraded or serviced.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advantech Brasil

Avenida Fagundes Filho 134, São Paulo, 04304-010 , BR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fundada em 1983, a Advantech tem a visão corporativa de "Possibilitar um Planeta Inteligente". A empresa é líder global nas áreas de sistemas inteligentes de IoT e plataformas embarcadas. Para abraçar as tendências de IoT, big data e inteligência artificial, a Advantech promove soluções de hardware e software de IoT com Edge Intelligence para auxiliar parceiros de negócios e clientes na conexão de cadeias industriais. A Advantech também se dedica a trabalhar com parceiros focados no domínio para co-criar soluções que oferecem soluções avançadas em IoT Industrial.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rackapps.jpeg
Rackapps
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantech-brasil-ltda.jpeg
Advantech Brasil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rackapps
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advantech Brasil
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rackapps in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advantech Brasil in 2025.

Incident History — Rackapps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rackapps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advantech Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advantech Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rackapps.jpeg
Rackapps
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantech-brasil-ltda.jpeg
Advantech Brasil
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Rackapps company and Advantech Brasil company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Advantech Brasil company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rackapps company has not reported any.

In the current year, Advantech Brasil company and Rackapps company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Advantech Brasil company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Rackapps company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Advantech Brasil company nor Rackapps company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advantech Brasil company nor Rackapps company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rackapps company nor Advantech Brasil company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Advantech Brasil company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rackapps company.

Advantech Brasil company employs more people globally than Rackapps company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rackapps nor Advantech Brasil holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H