Comparison Overview

Rabobank

VS

Caisse d’Epargne

Rabobank

Croeselaan 18, Utrecht, 3521CB, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Rabobank is a cooperative bank with a mission. Our goal: to help customers realize their ambitions. We serve about 10 million customers in 47 countries. As an international financial institution, we work on the well-being and prosperity of millions of people. In the Netherlands, we serve individual and business customers. Globally, we focus on the food and agriculture sectors. For big or small challenges, in every area, people join forces in search of solutions. Rabobank has been doing this for 125 years, and we will continue to grow a better world together. As an employer, we support the growth of colleagues every day. At Rabobank, you can work on your own development & shape the world around you. This is reflected in your own development budget, our hybrid work environment, and a good balance between your work and home life. You can work on banking matters for our individual and business customers, as well as on societal issues such as food and energy transitions.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 48,563
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Caisse d’Epargne

50 avenue Pierre Mendes France, Paris, 75012, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Banques coopératives, les Caisses d'Epargne conjuguent depuis 1818 confiance, solidarité et modernité. Deuxième réseau bancaire en France, les 16 Caisses d'Epargne régionales comptent parmi les premières banques de leur région. Elles accompagnent tous les acteurs économiques et sont leaders du financement du secteur public, du logement social et de l'économie sociale. Au total, les Caisses d'Epargne comptent aujourd'hui 4,8 millions de sociétaires et 20,6 millions de clients, gérés par les 4 182 agences bancaires et l’agence Mon banquier en ligne.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 21,030
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rabobank.jpeg
Rabobank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caissedepargne.jpeg
Caisse d’Epargne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rabobank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Caisse d’Epargne
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rabobank in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caisse d’Epargne in 2026.

Incident History — Rabobank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rabobank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Caisse d’Epargne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caisse d’Epargne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rabobank.jpeg
Rabobank
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caissedepargne.jpeg
Caisse d’Epargne
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Inondation de requêtes et connexions
Motivation: Perturbation des services critiques, possible motivation géopolitique
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rabobank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Caisse d’Epargne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rabobank and Caisse d’Epargne have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Caisse d’Epargne company and Rabobank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Caisse d’Epargne company nor Rabobank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rabobank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Caisse d’Epargne company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Caisse d’Epargne company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Rabobank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rabobank company nor Caisse d’Epargne company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rabobank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Caisse d’Epargne company.

Rabobank company employs more people globally than Caisse d’Epargne company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rabobank nor Caisse d’Epargne holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.