Comparison Overview

Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC

VS

DLA Piper Venture Capital

Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC

293 Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 100, Livingston, 07039, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The legal representation you receive should complement your own distinct approach; the advocacy should reinforce your strategy, and the end result of any legal engagement should advance your objectives. At Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC we deliver such client service, by: Listening attentively and patiently to our client's problems, concerns and goals Conducting thorough research, so that all options can be explored and explained Identifying and implementing, as directed, the chosen means of achieving a desired result Throughout our relationship, our doors will always be open. We promise full and candid communication. We promise timely response. We promise to be proactive in representing your interests. We promise to seek and respect your input in all aspects of decision-making. The responsibility and trust that accompanies the opportunity to serve our clients is the guiding philosophy which forms the foundation of our firm.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DLA Piper Venture Capital

2000 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, 94303-2214, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

DLA Piper is an industry leader in emerging growth and venture capital with lawyers around the world who specifically serve entrepreneurs, emerging technology companies and venture funds. With a footprint in over 20 US markets, and over 40 countries globally, we are in an unparalleled position to effectively represent venture capital clients investing abroad and emerging companies going global.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rabinowitz-lubetkin-&-tully-llc.jpeg
Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dla-piper-venture-capital.jpeg
DLA Piper Venture Capital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DLA Piper Venture Capital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Venture Capital in 2025.

Incident History — Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DLA Piper Venture Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper Venture Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rabinowitz-lubetkin-&-tully-llc.jpeg
Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dla-piper-venture-capital.jpeg
DLA Piper Venture Capital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DLA Piper Venture Capital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DLA Piper Venture Capital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company.

In the current year, DLA Piper Venture Capital company and Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DLA Piper Venture Capital company nor Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DLA Piper Venture Capital company nor Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DLA Piper Venture Capital company nor Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company nor DLA Piper Venture Capital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DLA Piper Venture Capital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC company.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC nor DLA Piper Venture Capital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X