Comparison Overview

R.P. Luce & Company, Inc

VS

Triangle Engineering, Inc.

R.P. Luce & Company, Inc

undefined, undefined, undefined, 11768, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rpluce.com

R.P. Luce & Company, Inc, is a supplier of reusable shipping containers and cases for the transportation of fragile equipment. We are authorized Dealers / Distributors for Pelican Products, Zarges Cases and Shell Cases. We also act as Technical Representatives for a number of companies that manufacture precision mechanical components. Those companies include Boker's, Helical Products, Riverhawk, Kipp Inc. and Designatronics.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Triangle Engineering, Inc.

6 Industrial Way, Hanover, MA, 02339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trieng.com

Triangle Engineering, Inc. is a 3rd generation family business that provides materials, destructive test equipment and testing services to organizations that must perform welder and weld procedure qualification testing. From 63 years in business, we have the welding code expertise and applied knowledge to supply customers, ranging from the individual welder to global organizations, with the immediate shipment of the specific materials and equipment needed for their weld training or testing requirement.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r.p.-luce-&-company-inc_2.jpeg
R.P. Luce & Company, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triangle-engineering-inc..jpeg
Triangle Engineering, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R.P. Luce & Company, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Triangle Engineering, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R.P. Luce & Company, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triangle Engineering, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — R.P. Luce & Company, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R.P. Luce & Company, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Triangle Engineering, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triangle Engineering, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r.p.-luce-&-company-inc_2.jpeg
R.P. Luce & Company, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triangle-engineering-inc..jpeg
Triangle Engineering, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Triangle Engineering, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Triangle Engineering, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company.

In the current year, Triangle Engineering, Inc. company and R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Triangle Engineering, Inc. company nor R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Triangle Engineering, Inc. company nor R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Triangle Engineering, Inc. company nor R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Triangle Engineering, Inc. company employs more people globally than R.P. Luce & Company, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R.P. Luce & Company, Inc nor Triangle Engineering, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References