Comparison Overview

R Street Institute

VS

Council on Foreign Relations

R Street Institute

1411 K St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rstreet.org

The R Street Institute (RSI) is a leading think tank focused on solving complex public policy challenges through free markets and limited, effective government. RSI consistently offers pragmatic, real solutions that foster American innovation, bolster competition, and safeguard individual liberty—all with the understanding that life in a democratic society sometimes requires compromises that don’t necessarily represent first, best solutions. While RSI’s primary audience is policymakers, influencing public policy is not always linear. Policymakers, policy experts, partner organizations, academics, media, and donors are all part of RSI’s ecosystem. Together, these different stakeholders and collaborators enable RSI to influence real public policy change. Learn more: https://www.rstreet.org/about-r-street/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Council on Foreign Relations

58 East 68th Sreet, New York, 10065, US
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cfr.org

The mission of the Council on Foreign Relations is to inform U.S. engagement with the world. Founded in 1921, CFR is a nonpartisan, independent national membership organization, think tank, educator, and publisher, including of Foreign Affairs. It generates policy-relevant ideas and analysis, convenes experts and policymakers, and promotes informed public discussion—all to have impact on the most consequential issues facing the United States and the world. CFR's website, www.cfr.org, is a trusted, nonpartisan source of timely analysis and context on international events and trends. CFR publishes the bimonthly Foreign Affairs magazine, widely-considered to be the most influential magazine for the analysis and debate of foreign policy and economics. Follow us: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cfr_org/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@cfr_org X: http://x.com/CFR_org YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/cfr/featured Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 2,126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r-street-institute.jpeg
R Street Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-foreign-relations.jpeg
Council on Foreign Relations
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R Street Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Council on Foreign Relations
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R Street Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council on Foreign Relations in 2025.

Incident History — R Street Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R Street Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Council on Foreign Relations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council on Foreign Relations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r-street-institute.jpeg
R Street Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-foreign-relations.jpeg
Council on Foreign Relations
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Council on Foreign Relations company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to R Street Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Council on Foreign Relations company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R Street Institute company.

In the current year, Council on Foreign Relations company and R Street Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations company nor R Street Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations company nor R Street Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Council on Foreign Relations company nor R Street Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R Street Institute company nor Council on Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R Street Institute company nor Council on Foreign Relations company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Council on Foreign Relations company employs more people globally than R Street Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R Street Institute nor Council on Foreign Relations holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References