Comparison Overview

R&J Graphics

VS

General Press Corporation

R&J Graphics

45 Central Avenue, Farmingdale, NY, 11735, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rjgraphicsinc.com

Founded in 1983 by John R. Merendino, R&J Graphics specializes in fine commercial printing for the Northeast. From start-to-finish, the firm takes great pride in the professional services it provides clients every step of the way. From the moment an assignment is given to R&J, the job is treated with care and concern until it is completed and reaches its final destination. We stand behind our commitments to meeting deadlines and providing outstanding service with a quality standard of excellence every time. Your reputation as well as ours depends upon it. With a combined 100 years of experience in the printing industry, the team at R&J Graphics is knowledgeable about all the most current pre-press, printing and bindery methods. R&J utilizes the latest state-of-the-art technology to meet and exceed the printing requirements and standards of the clients we serve. We invite you to drop by our ISO certified facility to meet the team and learn more about our operation, which is proudly certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. We're located at 45 Central Avenue in Farmingdale, NY 11735. Business Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30am-5pm

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

General Press Corporation

110 Allegheny Dr, Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania, 15065, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://generalpress.com

General Press is a premier cut and stack label supplier. We are a full-service labeling company that specialize in IML (injection molded labels), blow mold, and paper labels. We produce a wide variety of labels for the food, beverage, and automotive industries. Our capabilities allow us to print on a variety of plastic and paper substrates. Our finishing services include die-cutting for special shapes for your branding. We provide the highest quality labeling for products of every kind, from startups to leading national and international brands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r&j-graphics.jpeg
R&J Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-press-corp-.jpeg
General Press Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R&J Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
General Press Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R&J Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Press Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — R&J Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R&J Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — General Press Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Press Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r&j-graphics.jpeg
R&J Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-press-corp-.jpeg
General Press Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

R&J Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to General Press Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, General Press Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R&J Graphics company.

In the current year, General Press Corporation company and R&J Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither General Press Corporation company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither General Press Corporation company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither General Press Corporation company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R&J Graphics company nor General Press Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R&J Graphics company nor General Press Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

General Press Corporation company employs more people globally than R&J Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor General Press Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References