Comparison Overview

R&J Graphics

VS

Namify

R&J Graphics

45 Central Avenue, Farmingdale, NY, 11735, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1983 by John R. Merendino, R&J Graphics specializes in fine commercial printing for the Northeast. From start-to-finish, the firm takes great pride in the professional services it provides clients every step of the way. From the moment an assignment is given to R&J, the job is treated with care and concern until it is completed and reaches its final destination. We stand behind our commitments to meeting deadlines and providing outstanding service with a quality standard of excellence every time. Your reputation as well as ours depends upon it. With a combined 100 years of experience in the printing industry, the team at R&J Graphics is knowledgeable about all the most current pre-press, printing and bindery methods. R&J utilizes the latest state-of-the-art technology to meet and exceed the printing requirements and standards of the clients we serve. We invite you to drop by our ISO certified facility to meet the team and learn more about our operation, which is proudly certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. We're located at 45 Central Avenue in Farmingdale, NY 11735. Business Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30am-5pm

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Namify

280 West 900 North, Springville, UT, 84663, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Namify is a U.S. manufacturer of identification and branding items, offering same-day services in Graphic Design, Full Color Printing, Engraving, Embroidery, and Wide Format Printing. Namify serves over 130,000 clients worldwide, including over 65% of the Fortune 500. Flagship products include: - Name Tags - Lanyards - Vinyl Banners - Office Signs - Screen Printed and Embroidered Apparel - Gifts and Awards - Promotional Giveaways

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r&j-graphics.jpeg
R&J Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/namify.jpeg
Namify
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R&J Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Namify
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R&J Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Namify in 2025.

Incident History — R&J Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R&J Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Namify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Namify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r&j-graphics.jpeg
R&J Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/namify.jpeg
Namify
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

R&J Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Namify company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Namify company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R&J Graphics company.

In the current year, Namify company and R&J Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Namify company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Namify company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Namify company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R&J Graphics company nor Namify company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R&J Graphics company nor Namify company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Namify company employs more people globally than R&J Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Namify holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N