Comparison Overview

R&J Graphics

VS

Arkansas Graphics, Inc.

R&J Graphics

45 Central Avenue, Farmingdale, NY, 11735, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rjgraphicsinc.com

Founded in 1983 by John R. Merendino, R&J Graphics specializes in fine commercial printing for the Northeast. From start-to-finish, the firm takes great pride in the professional services it provides clients every step of the way. From the moment an assignment is given to R&J, the job is treated with care and concern until it is completed and reaches its final destination. We stand behind our commitments to meeting deadlines and providing outstanding service with a quality standard of excellence every time. Your reputation as well as ours depends upon it. With a combined 100 years of experience in the printing industry, the team at R&J Graphics is knowledgeable about all the most current pre-press, printing and bindery methods. R&J utilizes the latest state-of-the-art technology to meet and exceed the printing requirements and standards of the clients we serve. We invite you to drop by our ISO certified facility to meet the team and learn more about our operation, which is proudly certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. We're located at 45 Central Avenue in Farmingdale, NY 11735. Business Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30am-5pm

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Arkansas Graphics, Inc.

800 S Gaines St, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://arkansasgraphics.com

Arkansas Graphics, Inc., a customer-focused, technology-led commercial printing company based in Little Rock, Arkansas, has been in business for over 45 years. We have built a proud heritage on the core skills of a traditional commercial printing company, while staying on the cutting edge of new technologies and working practices. More than just a printing company; we offer many solutions to our customers that allow them to communicate effectively. Whether it is traditional litho printing, new digital variable printing, web-based communication, large display graphics or even Laser die cutting, we are here to serve you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r&j-graphics.jpeg
R&J Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-graphics-inc.jpeg
Arkansas Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R&J Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arkansas Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R&J Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — R&J Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R&J Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arkansas Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r&j-graphics.jpeg
R&J Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-graphics-inc.jpeg
Arkansas Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

R&J Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R&J Graphics company.

In the current year, Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company and R&J Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company nor R&J Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R&J Graphics company nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R&J Graphics company nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company employs more people globally than R&J Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R&J Graphics nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References