Comparison Overview

Qulliq Energy Corporation

VS

Entergy

Qulliq Energy Corporation

P.O Box 420, Baker Lake, X0C 0A0, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 700 and 749

Following Nunavut’s division from the Northwest Territories, the Nunavut Power Corporation took up the mandate to supply electricity to communities in the territory of Nunavut on April 1, 2001. Renamed Qulliq Energy Corporation (QEC) in 2003, this territorial corporation is 100 per cent owned by the Government of Nunavut, and operates at arm’s length from the government, reporting to the territorial Minister responsible for QEC. We are the only generator and distributor of electrical energy in Nunavut. QEC is incorporated and operates under the Qulliq Energy Corporation Act and our energy pricing is regulated pursuant to the Utility Rates Review Council Act. We are committed to supplying safe, reliable and efficient energy through responsive and respectful interaction with all stakeholders. We deliver electricity to approximately 15,000 electrical customers across Nunavut. We generate and distribute power to Nunavummiut through the operation of 25 stand-alone diesel power plants in 25 communities, with a total installed capacity of approximately 76,000 kW. At QEC, we also provide mechanical, electrical and line maintenance from three regional centers: Iqaluit, Rankin Inlet and Cambridge Bay. Our business activities are maintained at the head office located in Baker Lake and corporate offices in Iqaluit. QEC has 200 employees across the territory. All electricity needs in Nunavut are met by imported fossil fuel supplies. Each community in Nunavut has its own independent electricity generation and distribution system. There is no back-up grid. QEC is the only energy corporation in Canada without developed local energy resources or regional electricity transmission capability, creating a situation of high dependency on fossil fuel.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Entergy

639 Loyola Ave, New Orleans, 70113, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

At Entergy (NYSE: ETR), we power life. More than 100 years ago, our founder Harvey Couch started this company with a handshake, some sawdust and a vision. Couch wanted to bring safe, affordable, reliable energy to the Middle South – energy that would power the lives of people and communities. Today, we own and operate one of the cleanest large-scale U.S. power generating fleets including more than five gigawatts of carbon-free nuclear capacity, a fleet of highly efficient gas resources, and a fast-growing portfolio of renewable resources. The nearly 12,000 men and women of Entergy deliver electricity and gas services to 3 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, generating annual GAAP revenues of $13.8 billion. Headquartered in New Orleans, we continue to play a driving role in the economic growth of the Gulf South. Our work matters. That’s been true for more than 100 years. And as we look to the next century, we remember the constant that bridges our past and future: We Power Life. Fast Facts: Entergy currently has a 90% rating on the 2022 Corporate Equality Index released by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. This score places Entergy among the top energy and utility companies in the survey. With roots in the Gulf South region for more than a century, Entergy is a recognized leader in corporate citizenship, delivering more than $100 million in economic benefits to local communities through philanthropy and advocacy efforts annually over the last several years. With a total of 44 awards from EEI for its restoration and mutual-assistance work, Entergy remains the only utility company to have won either EEI's Recovery or Assistance Award, or both, every year since the awards began in 1998.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,016
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qulliq-energy-corporation.jpeg
Qulliq Energy Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/entergy.jpeg
Entergy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Qulliq Energy Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Entergy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Qulliq Energy Corporation in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Entergy in 2026.

Incident History — Qulliq Energy Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qulliq Energy Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Entergy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Entergy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qulliq-energy-corporation.jpeg
Qulliq Energy Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/entergy.jpeg
Entergy
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2016
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Entergy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Qulliq Energy Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Qulliq Energy Corporation and Entergy have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Entergy company and Qulliq Energy Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Entergy company nor Qulliq Energy Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Qulliq Energy Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Entergy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Entergy company nor Qulliq Energy Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation company nor Entergy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation company nor Entergy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Entergy company employs more people globally than Qulliq Energy Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Qulliq Energy Corporation nor Entergy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N