Comparison Overview

QuikPrint

VS

Banner-man.co.uk

QuikPrint

undefined, undefined, undefined, 85737, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Our mission is to provide you with the highest-quality products and services possible in a timely fashion and at a competitive price. We promise to listen to you and help you achieve your business goals. We will always be there with honest, expert advice and quick, friendly customer service. Our goal is to meet and exceed your expectations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Banner-man.co.uk

The Vault Barkerend Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, undefined, BD3 9AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Banner Man help you to shout about your Event, Product or Brand! We provide a large range of indoor and outdoor advertising banners and banner "Selfie Frames"​ to add the fun and entertainment to your event Canvas prints at a full range of sizes We work with Marketing and Event Agencies, Businesses and the general public Based in Bradford supplying supply UK wide Online orders: http://www.banner-man.co.uk/

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quikprint.jpeg
QuikPrint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
QuikPrint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Banner-man.co.uk
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QuikPrint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banner-man.co.uk in 2025.

Incident History — QuikPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QuikPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Banner-man.co.uk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banner-man.co.uk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quikprint.jpeg
QuikPrint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/banner-man.co.uk.jpeg
Banner-man.co.uk
Incidents

FAQ

QuikPrint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Banner-man.co.uk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Banner-man.co.uk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to QuikPrint company.

In the current year, Banner-man.co.uk company and QuikPrint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk company nor QuikPrint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk company nor QuikPrint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Banner-man.co.uk company nor QuikPrint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither QuikPrint company nor Banner-man.co.uk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither QuikPrint company nor Banner-man.co.uk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

QuikPrint company employs more people globally than Banner-man.co.uk company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither QuikPrint nor Banner-man.co.uk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N