Comparison Overview

Quidd

VS

Airbnb

Quidd

Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 700 and 749

Quidd is the original digital collectibles platform and now the digital collectibles and NFT studio and marketplace of Animoca Brands. Quidd is a platform and community that lets fans collect what they love, with over 325 brands and more than 8M users.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Airbnb

888 Brannan Street, San Francisco, CA, US, 94103
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849

Airbnb was born in 2007 when two hosts welcomed three guests to their San Francisco home, and has since grown to over 5 million hosts who have welcomed over 2 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe. Every day, hosts offer unique stays, experiences and services that make it possible for guests to connect with communities in a more authentic way.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 58,281
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quidd-inc.jpeg
Quidd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbnb.jpeg
Airbnb
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quidd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Airbnb
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quidd in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Airbnb has 63.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Quidd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quidd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Airbnb (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbnb cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quidd-inc.jpeg
Quidd
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbnb.jpeg
Airbnb
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phantom listing scam, Bait and switch scams, Fake positive reviews, Misleading property images, Delusive tactics
Motivation: Criminal intent or nefarious financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Airbnb company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Quidd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Quidd and Airbnb have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Airbnb company has reported more cyber incidents than Quidd company.

Neither Airbnb company nor Quidd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Quidd company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Airbnb company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Airbnb company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Quidd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Quidd company nor Airbnb company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Airbnb company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Quidd company.

Airbnb company employs more people globally than Quidd company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quidd nor Airbnb holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N