Comparison Overview

Quest Service Labs Inc

VS

Applied Control Concepts

Quest Service Labs Inc

2307 E Aurora Rd Unit B-10, Twinsburg, Ohio, 44087-1958, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Quest Service Labs provides Prime Labeling and Printing Solutions to meet the tough challenges of modern labeling needs from turnkey labeling systems, RFID printers and scanners to label application software and labeling automation. Our professionals are factory trained by every manufacturer we partner with, giving us the technical expertise to service and maintain your system from sale to upgrade.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Applied Control Concepts

207 Hulco Drive, Scott, LA, US, 70583
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our focus is delivering high quality, high spec control system to industry. We specialize in Combustion, Compression and Power Generation systems and are very customer oriented. We involve our customers through the engineering, design and assembly phases of their project and always welcome shop inspections. All system include Factory Acceptance Testing by the customer or inspector at no charge. We can offer Turn-Key projects because we can control all phases in-house. Engineering, design, drafting and panel assembly are all conducted in one location with a project manager assigned to your project from bid to startup.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quest-service-labs-inc.jpeg
Quest Service Labs Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-concepts.jpeg
Applied Control Concepts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quest Service Labs Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applied Control Concepts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quest Service Labs Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Control Concepts in 2025.

Incident History — Quest Service Labs Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quest Service Labs Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applied Control Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Control Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quest-service-labs-inc.jpeg
Quest Service Labs Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-concepts.jpeg
Applied Control Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quest Service Labs Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Applied Control Concepts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Applied Control Concepts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quest Service Labs Inc company.

In the current year, Applied Control Concepts company and Quest Service Labs Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor Quest Service Labs Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor Quest Service Labs Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor Quest Service Labs Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc company nor Applied Control Concepts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Quest Service Labs Inc company employs more people globally than Applied Control Concepts company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc nor Applied Control Concepts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H