Comparison Overview

Quenneville Inc

VS

IRICO

Quenneville Inc

39 Parc Avenue, Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, Quebec, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Founded in 1903, machining, welding and assembling are our roots. Over the last 10 years, we have developed expertise in the ground transportation industry, specifically in passenger rail car interior components through our aluminium profiles machining capabilities and in custom built steel assembly jigs. ur offering extends from raw material procurement down to customised packaging including plan reviews and production optimisation such as, anodizing, hardening, painting and sub assembly. We have CNC machining capability for parts of up to 7700 mm in length and 1220 mm diameter. Finally, through our technical department we have the ability to deliver at each stage of the manufacturing process from prototype development to production manufacturing. We are ISO-9001-2008 and can provide FAI certification and C of C.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IRICO

No. 91, Tehran, 4111-4897-4133, IR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Iranian Golden Goal Group (IGGG) with long-lasting experience and service as a general contractor with the aim of implementing constructional projects in the fields of: oil, gas , petrochemical industries, steel manufacturing, railway transportation, construction and installing plants. IGGG top managers, decided to buy 100% stocks of IRICO and become one of the affiliated companies of Group. IRICO is a pioneer of design and manufacture different types of passenger coaches (such as regional passenger train, mass transit system, Light Rail Vehicle and Elevated Light Rail Transit) and freight wagons in Iran with production capacity of almost 200 units passenger cars and 500 Freight wagons per year. Some of the IRICO's productions are : Regional DMU in contract with Hyundai Rotem, Metro cars and diffrent typpes of Freight wagons .

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quenneville-inc.jpeg
Quenneville Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/irico.jpeg
IRICO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quenneville Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IRICO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quenneville Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IRICO in 2025.

Incident History — Quenneville Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quenneville Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IRICO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IRICO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quenneville-inc.jpeg
Quenneville Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/irico.jpeg
IRICO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Quenneville Inc company and IRICO company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, IRICO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quenneville Inc company.

In the current year, IRICO company and Quenneville Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IRICO company nor Quenneville Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IRICO company nor Quenneville Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IRICO company nor Quenneville Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quenneville Inc company nor IRICO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quenneville Inc company nor IRICO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IRICO company employs more people globally than Quenneville Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quenneville Inc nor IRICO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H