Comparison Overview

Queens County Bar Association

VS

Stewart Richardson and Associates

Queens County Bar Association

88-14 Sutphin Blvd, 3rd Fl, Jamaica, New York, 11435, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Queens County Bar Association has provided dedicated service to the legal profession and the community of Queens, New York for more than 147 years. Founded in 1876, the QCBA boasts more than 1,400 members joining together for a common purpose. They include many distinguished members of the bench and bar. With more than 60 active committees, the Queens County Bar Association is concerned with a wide variety of legal areas and service to the public. This is evident in our mission.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stewart Richardson and Associates

211 North Pennsylvania, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We believe in delivering deposition solutions that give you complete freedom to focus on your case, not on the minutiae of scheduling. Our goal is to provide you with an easy, extraordinary deposition experience whenever and wherever you need it. In addition to offering you a superior deposition experience, our full range of litigation services are designed to meet your needs locally, nationally and internationally.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queens-county-bar-association.jpeg
Queens County Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stewart-richardson-&-associates.jpeg
Stewart Richardson and Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Queens County Bar Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stewart Richardson and Associates
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queens County Bar Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stewart Richardson and Associates in 2025.

Incident History — Queens County Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queens County Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stewart Richardson and Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stewart Richardson and Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queens-county-bar-association.jpeg
Queens County Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stewart-richardson-&-associates.jpeg
Stewart Richardson and Associates
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stewart Richardson and Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Queens County Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stewart Richardson and Associates company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Queens County Bar Association company.

In the current year, Stewart Richardson and Associates company and Queens County Bar Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stewart Richardson and Associates company nor Queens County Bar Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stewart Richardson and Associates company nor Queens County Bar Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stewart Richardson and Associates company nor Queens County Bar Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Queens County Bar Association company nor Stewart Richardson and Associates company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Queens County Bar Association company nor Stewart Richardson and Associates company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stewart Richardson and Associates company employs more people globally than Queens County Bar Association company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Queens County Bar Association nor Stewart Richardson and Associates holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X