Comparison Overview

Qualprint

VS

InTouch Labels & Packaging

Qualprint

3 Federico Drive, Pittsfield, 01201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

While still guided by family values and led by the third generation, Quality Printing, now known as Qualprint, has become an internationally recognized, award-winning business serving the print needs of customers globally. At Qualprint, we deliver high-quality craftsmanship, exemplary service and fast turnaround. We call it the “Qualprint Experience”. As a boutique printer we collaborate with designers, agencies and our customers to guide them in their design – we show them how to add embossing, foil, finishing, specialty paper and so much more. We keep everything in house to ensure premium quality printed goods, and an unwavering attention to detail, that is rarely achieved in the printing industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

InTouch Labels & Packaging

12 Technology Drive, North Chelmsford, MA, 01863, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

When experience meets innovation, coupled with speed and quality, you have the InTouch Labels difference. Since 1992, we have been on the cutting-edge of the digital printing revolution. We prioritize continuous evolution to ensure we can offer diverse solutions to meet our diverse customer needs. A couple of perks extended to all InTouch customers include, no minimums, no set up fees, and orders shipping in 5 days or less.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualprint.jpeg
Qualprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intouch-labels-inc.jpeg
InTouch Labels & Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Qualprint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
InTouch Labels & Packaging
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Qualprint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InTouch Labels & Packaging in 2025.

Incident History — Qualprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qualprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — InTouch Labels & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InTouch Labels & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualprint.jpeg
Qualprint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intouch-labels-inc.jpeg
InTouch Labels & Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Qualprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InTouch Labels & Packaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, InTouch Labels & Packaging company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Qualprint company.

In the current year, InTouch Labels & Packaging company and Qualprint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither InTouch Labels & Packaging company nor Qualprint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither InTouch Labels & Packaging company nor Qualprint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither InTouch Labels & Packaging company nor Qualprint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Qualprint company nor InTouch Labels & Packaging company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Qualprint company nor InTouch Labels & Packaging company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Qualprint company employs more people globally than InTouch Labels & Packaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Qualprint nor InTouch Labels & Packaging holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N