Comparison Overview

QualityHealth

VS

dentsu

QualityHealth

101 Hudson Street, Jersey City, New Jersey, 07302, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

QualityHealth is the leading performance-based marketing provider to the healthcare industry serving the pharmaceutical, biotech, consumer products, and health and wellness sectors. Over time the company has developed the platform, skills, and experience required to deliver large-scale marketing programs where clients pay for the actual consumer responses delivered. In the last three years alone, QualityHealth has worked with hundreds of companies and their agencies, identifying the most suitable consumers for their products, delivering targeted marketing tactics, and prompting measurable actions toward product usage. QualityHealth continues to drive innovation in consumer contact strategies, new advertising technologies, and social and mobile media to ensure that its clients gain full advantage of the tremendous improvements in efficiency and accountability enabled by digital media.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, undefined, undefined, JP
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern creativity. We are the network designed for whatโ€™s next.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 17,325
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualityhealth.jpeg
QualityHealth
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu.jpeg
dentsu
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
QualityHealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
dentsu
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QualityHealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2025.

Incident History โ€” QualityHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QualityHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualityhealth.jpeg
QualityHealth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu.jpeg
dentsu
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both QualityHealth company and dentsu company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, dentsu company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to QualityHealth company.

In the current year, dentsu company and QualityHealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither dentsu company nor QualityHealth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither dentsu company nor QualityHealth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither dentsu company nor QualityHealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither QualityHealth company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

dentsu company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to QualityHealth company.

dentsu company employs more people globally than QualityHealth company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N