Comparison Overview

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.

VS

LabelTec, Inc

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.

1174 Hayes Industrial Dr, Marietta, Georgia, 30062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Quality Tape & Label (or QTL for short) specializes in custom printed labels but offers a vast array of services and products to meet your labeling and packaging needs. Still owned and operated by the Daniels' Family today, we take pride in our small business attitude that can service every customer, large or small with unparalleled customer service. Among our services and products: * Flexographic Labels and Printing * Digital Labels and Printing * Shrink Sleeves * Flexible Packaging * Industrial Label Supply * Specialty Labels * Foil Stamping * In-House Plate Making * Quick Turnaround Times * Over 1,000 Dies in Stock * Graphic Design Whether you need 50 labels or 5 million, QTL is the right company for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LabelTec, Inc

113 Commerce Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80524, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

LabelTec is a full-service flexographic printing and converting company. Based in Colorado, LabelTec serves local, national and international markets. At LabelTec, we pride ourselves in our acquired knowledge in the printing industry and using that knowledge to target and fulfill our customers' needs. We know that a strong business partnership with our customers is the proven formula for mutual success. We will continue to earn our customers' confidence with every order placed. Misson Statement: To partner with our customers to create solutions for their packaging and labeling needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-tape-&-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labeltec-inc.jpeg
LabelTec, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LabelTec, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LabelTec, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LabelTec, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LabelTec, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-tape-&-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labeltec-inc.jpeg
LabelTec, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company and LabelTec, Inc company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, LabelTec, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company.

In the current year, LabelTec, Inc company and Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LabelTec, Inc company nor Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LabelTec, Inc company nor Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LabelTec, Inc company nor Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor LabelTec, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor LabelTec, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company employs more people globally than LabelTec, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor LabelTec, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L