Comparison Overview

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.

VS

CJ Graphics Inc.

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.

1174 Hayes Industrial Dr, Marietta, Georgia, 30062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Quality Tape & Label (or QTL for short) specializes in custom printed labels but offers a vast array of services and products to meet your labeling and packaging needs. Still owned and operated by the Daniels' Family today, we take pride in our small business attitude that can service every customer, large or small with unparalleled customer service. Among our services and products: * Flexographic Labels and Printing * Digital Labels and Printing * Shrink Sleeves * Flexible Packaging * Industrial Label Supply * Specialty Labels * Foil Stamping * In-House Plate Making * Quick Turnaround Times * Over 1,000 Dies in Stock * Graphic Design Whether you need 50 labels or 5 million, QTL is the right company for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CJ Graphics Inc.

560 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, L5A 1Y1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

CJ Graphics Inc., enjoys a solid reputation in our community for quality work that reflects our dedication to craftsmanship, partnership and responsibility. CJ Graphics Inc. started as a print brokerage company in Toronto, Canada, in 1981 and began operating its first press at 645 King Street East in 1985. From the beginning, our dedication to excellence has led us to invest in state-of-the-art equipment, to set the highest production standards, and to settle for nothing less than premium results in our finished products. When printed materials go out with your name on them, they become your voice. They are a tangible reminder of you and your message. That’s why it pays to ensure that all your printed materials are designed and crafted to meet your highest standards. At CJ Graphics Inc. we invest in state-of-the-art equipment and offer a broad range of services – in house. Whether your printing job calls for one colour or multi-colour, or whether you need die-cutting, riveting, hand finishing, letterpress printing, electronic prepress, embossing or hot foil stamping, we have the experience and the capabilities, and we will be competitive. In all areas we dedicate ourselves to the highest standards in order to achieve outstanding results.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-tape-&-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c.j.-graphics-inc..jpeg
CJ Graphics Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CJ Graphics Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CJ Graphics Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CJ Graphics Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CJ Graphics Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-tape-&-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c.j.-graphics-inc..jpeg
CJ Graphics Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CJ Graphics Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CJ Graphics Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company.

In the current year, CJ Graphics Inc. company and Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CJ Graphics Inc. company nor Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CJ Graphics Inc. company nor Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CJ Graphics Inc. company nor Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor CJ Graphics Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor CJ Graphics Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CJ Graphics Inc. company employs more people globally than Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Tape & Label Co., Inc. nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L