Comparison Overview

Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson

VS

Miguel Neto Advogados

Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson

4-5 Rutland House, Cheshire, undefined, WA7 2ES, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Welcome to QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson. For nearly 25 years we have been helping the people of North Cheshire, offering a range of services to suit any circumstance. We have a very friendly team who are experts at helping clients when moving house, making a will, setting up a business, or when they have suffered an accident that was not their fault, a family relationship that has broken down or a prosecution for a criminal offence. QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson has provided advice and support and most importantly someone to ‘fight their corner'. We do not just help people. We have experience and expertise in dealing with small and medium commercial enterprises. We are able to assist in a great many areas, including commercial set ups, company acquisitions and advising on and arranging commercial premises leases. QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson began in 1987 and now have five offices in Runcorn, Widnes, Warrington and Northwich. We pride ourselves in giving our clients a first rate legal service, with a personal touch. In that time QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson have established themselves as Solicitors with an excellent reputation for the quality of our work and our advice. We are easily accessible with most of our branches having a high street or close-to-high street presence, close to you. Why not take advantage of a Free initial consultation with one of our experienced solicitors? We hope to hear from you soon!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Miguel Neto Advogados

Rua Fidêncio Ramos, 308, 2º andar, Torre A - Vila Olímpia, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04551010
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Miguel Neto Advogados está estabelecido desde 1990 como um escritório abrangente, com foco empresarial, atuando nas principais áreas do Direito. Miguel Neto Advogados é formado por grupos de especialistas dedicados, com alta precisão técnica, eficiência e estratégia, ao atendimento das necessidades de cada cliente. Desenvolvemos nossas atividades profissionais com base nos seguintes vetores: - Envolvimento integral dos sócios durante todo o projeto, visando a construir uma relação de proximidade com o cliente e seu negócio; - Adaptação às necessidades dos clientes, levando em consideração seu histórico, contexto e estratégia comercial; - Atuação com objetividade e pensamento inovador. Miguel Neto Advogados mantem estreita parceria com escritórios de advocacia do mundo inteiro. Destacam-se Interlegal, AIJA, UIA, Mergermarket e IBA. Essa parceria permite a condução de projetos nacionais e internacionais com a mesma eficiência no atendimento. Nosso escritório orgulha-se de ter, como características, a confiança de seus clientes e parceiros e o comprometimento com o negócio de cada um deles. Essa foi a chave mestra da nossa atuação nos últimos anos e é isso que nos guia para o futuro.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-solicitors-jones-robertson.jpeg
Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miguel-neto-advogados.jpeg
Miguel Neto Advogados
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Miguel Neto Advogados
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Miguel Neto Advogados in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Miguel Neto Advogados (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Miguel Neto Advogados cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-solicitors-jones-robertson.jpeg
Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miguel-neto-advogados.jpeg
Miguel Neto Advogados
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company and Miguel Neto Advogados company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Miguel Neto Advogados company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company.

In the current year, Miguel Neto Advogados company and Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Miguel Neto Advogados company nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Miguel Neto Advogados company nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Miguel Neto Advogados company nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company nor Miguel Neto Advogados company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company nor Miguel Neto Advogados company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Miguel Neto Advogados company employs more people globally than Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson nor Miguel Neto Advogados holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X