Comparison Overview

Quality Printers

VS

CleanMark

Quality Printers

10485 Theodore Green Blvd, White Plains, MD 20695, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We are an award-winning, big-picture thinking, dot-connecting printing company that employs solutionists who have an understanding of both traditional and digital printing and design. We develop creative answers to your questions in the form of print materials, creative services, and non-traditional media. Essentially, we study your needs and support you in choosing the best possible solutions. Our sub-division, QP2 Creative, is a studio focusing further on industry trends and creative services to meet your branding, advertising, and marketing needs. So if you’re interested in anything from a brochure to a cultural brand, we are here to support you! As a part of our ongoing outreach to the community we also host various arts and entertainment events for your enjoyment. Check out the SMC3 schedule or like us on facebook and stop by to see the front of our shop turn into an intimate music venue, or an art gallery event. We can also set up the space for YOUR next business or community outreach event. Imagine the possibilities and call us or stop by for details.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CleanMark

6700 SW Bradbury Ct, Portland, OR, 97224, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

CleanMark Labels is the industry leader in providing innovative and reliable labeling solutions tailored for cleanroom environments and demanding industrial applications. Our extensive expertise and commitment to excellence enable us to support the critical work of leading companies in semiconductor, pharmaceutical, medical device, and other high-tech sectors. By partnering with companies such as Intel, Micron, Lam Research, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Pfizer, we ensure that our labels meet the highest standards of performance, compliance, and durability. Additionally, our durable labeling solutions are engineered to withstand extreme conditions such as ultra-low temperatures, high heat, and exposure to harsh chemicals, ensuring reliable performance in the most challenging environments. Known for our consultative approach, we work closely with our customers to understand their unique needs and solve the toughest label challenges. Our mission is to empower our customers to focus on their groundbreaking work by delivering labeling solutions that are as dependable and precise as their innovations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-printers.jpeg
Quality Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Printers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CleanMark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Printers in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CleanMark in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CleanMark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CleanMark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-printers.jpeg
Quality Printers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quality Printers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CleanMark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CleanMark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Printers company.

In the current year, CleanMark company and Quality Printers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CleanMark company nor Quality Printers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CleanMark company nor Quality Printers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CleanMark company nor Quality Printers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Printers company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Printers company nor CleanMark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CleanMark company employs more people globally than Quality Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Printers nor CleanMark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N