Comparison Overview

Quality Labels

VS

National Custom Labels

Quality Labels

IE, 01
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Since its establishment in 1990 Quality Labels has gone from strength to strength. The company is 100% Irish owned and operated and is committed to continual re-investment in the business and this is evident from its very modest beginnings as a label printing company with one 3 colour printing press and a very basic rewinding machine, operating from a small factory, to now being one of the largest label companies in the country with multiple manufacturing sites and an extensive list of machinery with a total of 7 printing presses ranging from 3 colours up to 8 colours, 5 blank label presses, and 7 rewinding machines operating from four modern production facilities located in the greater Dublin area. We are not only committed to investment in the best of machinery but also in our staff. All of our staff are highly trained, experienced and vocational people. This philosophy of continual reinvestment has us at the forefront of the label industry and allows us to expand year on year. We understand that labelling is a small part of a person's business but it is also a critical part and for this reason all our customers receive the same level of respect, service and quality no matter what size of company they are and our customers range from small cottage industries to large multi-national blue chip companies. For further information please feel free to contact us at any stage. Ph: +353(0)14019018

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Custom Labels

18 South Murphy Ave, Brazil, Indiana, 47834, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

National Printing was founded in Los Angeles in 1963 supplying printed tapes to the aerospace industry. As the computer age began, NPC was one of the first companies to develop 'pin-feed'​ labels to run on the new computer printers. In 1972, National expanded its manufacturing Indiana and joined the NBFA - a trade association of Print Professionals across the country. By the 1980's, National was adhesive coating its own materials and developing labels to run through the new emerging technology of Laser Printers. This innovative and experimental attitude has enabled us to continue to provide custom Labels & Tags to meet our customers demands. We are guided by trusting relationships, an open and honest attitude and respect for our employees and customers. Built on Relationships!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-labels.jpeg
Quality Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalcustomlabels.jpeg
National Custom Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Custom Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Custom Labels in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Custom Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Custom Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-labels.jpeg
Quality Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalcustomlabels.jpeg
National Custom Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Custom Labels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Quality Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Custom Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Labels company.

In the current year, National Custom Labels company and Quality Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Labels company nor National Custom Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Labels company nor National Custom Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Custom Labels company employs more people globally than Quality Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor National Custom Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N