Comparison Overview

Quality Labels

VS

Fineprint Nottingham

Quality Labels

IE, 01
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Since its establishment in 1990 Quality Labels has gone from strength to strength. The company is 100% Irish owned and operated and is committed to continual re-investment in the business and this is evident from its very modest beginnings as a label printing company with one 3 colour printing press and a very basic rewinding machine, operating from a small factory, to now being one of the largest label companies in the country with multiple manufacturing sites and an extensive list of machinery with a total of 7 printing presses ranging from 3 colours up to 8 colours, 5 blank label presses, and 7 rewinding machines operating from four modern production facilities located in the greater Dublin area. We are not only committed to investment in the best of machinery but also in our staff. All of our staff are highly trained, experienced and vocational people. This philosophy of continual reinvestment has us at the forefront of the label industry and allows us to expand year on year. We understand that labelling is a small part of a person's business but it is also a critical part and for this reason all our customers receive the same level of respect, service and quality no matter what size of company they are and our customers range from small cottage industries to large multi-national blue chip companies. For further information please feel free to contact us at any stage. Ph: +353(0)14019018

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fineprint Nottingham

Hooton Street, Nottingham, undefined, NG3 2NJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Fineprint (Nottingham) Ltd. was founded in 1986 by Philip Nicol and Andrew Rajchel. The aim was to harness our many years of knowledge and experience in the printing industry to produce the highest quality of print and creative design at a competitive price. We offer a comprehensive in-house service, producing a broad selection of print and direct mail services. Our extensive client list have come to appreciate our friendly, relaxed and professional approach. From our beginnings back in 1986, Fineprint has grown steadily and are proud of the fact that all our staff have all been with us for a number of years. This highly experienced and close-knit team enables us to provide a wide range of services. Our aim from the start was to achieve concept to completion of printing jobs under one roof, all in-house. In order to provide a full service to clients we can also provide storage on site to hold customer stock at no extra charge.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-labels.jpeg
Quality Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineprint-nottingham.jpeg
Fineprint Nottingham
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fineprint Nottingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fineprint Nottingham in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fineprint Nottingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fineprint Nottingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-labels.jpeg
Quality Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineprint-nottingham.jpeg
Fineprint Nottingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quality Labels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fineprint Nottingham company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fineprint Nottingham company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Labels company.

In the current year, Fineprint Nottingham company and Quality Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fineprint Nottingham company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fineprint Nottingham company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fineprint Nottingham company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Labels company nor Fineprint Nottingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Labels company nor Fineprint Nottingham company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Quality Labels company employs more people globally than Fineprint Nottingham company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Labels nor Fineprint Nottingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N