Comparison Overview

Quality Assured Label, Inc

VS

Advertisers Printing Company

Quality Assured Label, Inc

2720 Nevada Ave N, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55427, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.qal.com

Quality Assured Label (QAL) has been an industry leader in producing quality packaging for over 30 years. We have printed over 50 billion packaging products and have more than 15 patented products and innovative processes in use on some of the leading global brands. QAL leads through innovation in 6 specific printed packaging product categories: Pressure Sensitive Labels, Roll-Fed Labels, Extended Content Labels (ECLs), Blister Cards, Cartons, and Coupons (Q-pons™) — all produced 100% in-line, offering cost efficiencies, consistent color between product categories, and quicker turn-around times.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Advertisers Printing Company

1229 Vandeventer Ave, St. Louis, MO, US, 63110
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.advertisersprinting.com

Here at Advertisers, we pride ourselves on our service quality and partner satisfaction. This is why many of our clients continue to utilize our services for their print communication needs. Print Marketing, Direct mail (omnichannel), packaging, and promotional materials. The sky's the limit to what we can accomplish and what we are able to print. We are here due to the client relationships we have built over the years, and we are always eager to build new ones! We are a family-owned and operated printing company based out of St. Louis, MO. We specialize in print services such as offset printing and digital printing and also extended services like digital storefronts and variable data management.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-assured.jpeg
Quality Assured Label, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-advertisers-printing-co-inc-.jpeg
Advertisers Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Quality Assured Label, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advertisers Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Assured Label, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advertisers Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Quality Assured Label, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Assured Label, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advertisers Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advertisers Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-assured.jpeg
Quality Assured Label, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-advertisers-printing-co-inc-.jpeg
Advertisers Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quality Assured Label, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advertisers Printing Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Advertisers Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Quality Assured Label, Inc company.

In the current year, Advertisers Printing Company company and Quality Assured Label, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advertisers Printing Company company nor Quality Assured Label, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Advertisers Printing Company company nor Quality Assured Label, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advertisers Printing Company company nor Quality Assured Label, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc company nor Advertisers Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc company nor Advertisers Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Advertisers Printing Company company employs more people globally than Quality Assured Label, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Quality Assured Label, Inc nor Advertisers Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References