Comparison Overview

QLM Label Makers

VS

Shirt Monkey

QLM Label Makers

1 Australand Dr, Berrinba, Queensland, 4117, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://qlm.com.au/

At QLM Label Makers we bring LABELS ALIVE with Premium Quality Labels, Beautiful Packaging and the Best Value Label Printers. When you are ready to bring your BRAND ALIVE speak with QLM. We start by asking "What do you want to achieve?"​ - so we can get a better understanding of your business and develop the right solutions to bring your LABELS ALIVE. We are passionate about achieving awesome results and will take an active interest in your business: - manufacturing for all industry requirements - diverse print capabilities - over 40 years manufacturing experience - small runs to large industrial quantities - blank and custom printed labels and tags Need Inspiration? Explore our custom label solutions or contact us now.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 162
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Shirt Monkey

Unit 4, Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 3PH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ShirtMonkey.co.uk

Our Story Shirt Monkey began printing in early 2013 with a single Brother GT-381 garment printer - building up a customer base and slowly increasing our daily printing levels. In early 2015 we upgraded our machines to the Kornit range, initially starting out with a single Breeze printer which was quickly upgraded to a Storm II. In early 2016 we took the huge leap and invested in our first Kornit Avalanche 1000 printer which has excelled the company to a whole new level. Late in 2016 we added our second Avalanche 1000 which has taken our daily DTG capacity levels to well in excess of 1000 units. Moving into 2017, will we be moving into new premises to allow for more base stock holding and the posibilities for increased investment and development. The new space is in excess of 10,000 sq ft and will be located just a few miles from our existing facility.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qlm-label-makers.jpeg
QLM Label Makers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eness-ltd.jpeg
Shirt Monkey
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
QLM Label Makers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shirt Monkey
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QLM Label Makers in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shirt Monkey in 2025.

Incident History — QLM Label Makers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QLM Label Makers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shirt Monkey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shirt Monkey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qlm-label-makers.jpeg
QLM Label Makers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eness-ltd.jpeg
Shirt Monkey
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

QLM Label Makers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shirt Monkey company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shirt Monkey company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to QLM Label Makers company.

In the current year, Shirt Monkey company and QLM Label Makers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shirt Monkey company nor QLM Label Makers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shirt Monkey company nor QLM Label Makers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shirt Monkey company nor QLM Label Makers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither QLM Label Makers company nor Shirt Monkey company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither QLM Label Makers company nor Shirt Monkey company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

QLM Label Makers company employs more people globally than Shirt Monkey company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds HIPAA certification.

Neither QLM Label Makers nor Shirt Monkey holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References