Comparison Overview

QDROCounsel

VS

AEON Law

QDROCounsel

750 S Reservoir St, None, Pomona, California, US, 91766
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

QDROCounsel changes how pension division and valuations are handled in the United States. The highly complex legal and financial issues that arise in pension division are critical in most divorces. In most cases, retirement benefits are the largest assets. And yet more often than not QDROs and Valuations are put on the back burner to be dealt at a later time, many times years after divorce to the detriment of the nonmember spouse. QDROCounsel empowers the family law attorney and financial professional to handle the process of pension division from start to finish.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AEON Law

506 2nd Ave., Seattle, Washington, 98104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

AEON Law is a high technology intellectual property law firm focused on patent, trademark, copyright and related IP. AEON Law’s base is in Seattle, Washington; however, our lawyers represent technology companies, individuals, start-ups, small and medium-sized businesses, and international corporations throughout the world. Unlike other firms tied to the billable hour, AEON Law focuses on helping our clients achieve their business goals through project-based pricing. By letting our clients know what a legal project will cost, we are able to empower them to make better business decisions around their most valuable assets: the products of their minds. From patents and trademarks, to copyrights and technology licensing, and everything in between, our lawyers are here to help.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qdrocounsel.jpeg
QDROCounsel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeon-law.jpeg
AEON Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
QDROCounsel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AEON Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QDROCounsel in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AEON Law in 2025.

Incident History — QDROCounsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QDROCounsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AEON Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AEON Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qdrocounsel.jpeg
QDROCounsel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeon-law.jpeg
AEON Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both QDROCounsel company and AEON Law company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, AEON Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to QDROCounsel company.

In the current year, AEON Law company and QDROCounsel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AEON Law company nor QDROCounsel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AEON Law company nor QDROCounsel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AEON Law company nor QDROCounsel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither QDROCounsel company nor AEON Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither QDROCounsel company nor AEON Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AEON Law company employs more people globally than QDROCounsel company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither QDROCounsel nor AEON Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X