Comparison Overview

QANTM IP

VS

Alaska Bar Association

QANTM IP

1 Nicholson St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

QANTM Intellectual Property Limited (QANTM) is the owner of a group of leading intellectual property (IP) services businesses operating independently in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Malaysia under four key brands – Davies Collison Cave (DCC), FPA Patent Attorneys (FPA), Cotters Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys (Cotters), and Advanz Fidelis IP. It is also the majority shareholder in an IP business advisory company, ipervescence Pty Ltd, which provide IP consulting and flexible resourcing services. The businesses offer their clients a suite of services associated with the creation, protection, commercialisation, enforcement and management of IP rights. With over 150 highly qualified professionals and over 270 years combined history, the QANTM Group businesses have a strong track record in providing IP services to a broad range of Australian and international clients, ranging from start-up technology businesses to Fortune 500 multinationals, public research institutions and universities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alaska Bar Association

840 K St, Anchorage, 99501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Alaska Bar Association has over 4,000 members. The Bar is governed by a Board of Governors, with nine attorneys elected by the membership and three public members appointed by the governor. The Bar is responsible to the Alaska Supreme Court for the admission and discipline process. The Bar also provides continuing legal education and other member services.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qantm-ip.jpeg
QANTM IP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alaska-bar-association.jpeg
Alaska Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
QANTM IP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alaska Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QANTM IP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alaska Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — QANTM IP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QANTM IP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alaska Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alaska Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qantm-ip.jpeg
QANTM IP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alaska-bar-association.jpeg
Alaska Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

QANTM IP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alaska Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alaska Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to QANTM IP company.

In the current year, Alaska Bar Association company and QANTM IP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alaska Bar Association company nor QANTM IP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alaska Bar Association company nor QANTM IP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alaska Bar Association company nor QANTM IP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither QANTM IP company nor Alaska Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

QANTM IP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Alaska Bar Association company.

QANTM IP company employs more people globally than Alaska Bar Association company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither QANTM IP nor Alaska Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X