Comparison Overview

PyPI

VS

Xiaomi Technology

PyPI

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Python Package Index (PyPI) is a repository of software for the Python programming language

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Xiaomi Technology

No. 33 Xi erqi Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing,100085,China, Beijing, Beijing, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Xiaomi Corporation was founded in April 2010 and listed on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 9, 2018 (1810.HK). Xiaomi is a consumer electronics and smart manufacturing company with smartphones and smart hardware connected by an IoT platform at its core. Embracing our vision of “Make friends with users and be the coolest company in the users’ hearts”, Xiaomi continuously pursues innovations, high-quality user experience and operational efficiency. The company relentlessly builds amazing products with honest prices to let everyone in the world enjoy a better life through innovative technology. Xiaomi is one of the world's leading smartphone companies. The company has also established the world’s leading consumer AIoT (AI+IoT) platform,reached 558 million smart devices connected to its platform (excluding smartphones,laptops and tablets) as of September 30 2022. Xiaomi products are present in more than 100 countries and regions around the world. In August 2022, Xiaomi was included in the Fortune Global 500 list for the fourth year in a row, ranking 266th. The company is the fastest-rising Chinese technology conglomerate during the four-year period. Xiaomi is a constituent of the Hang Seng Index, Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, Hang Seng TECH Index and Hang Seng China 50 Index.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 22,103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pypi.jpeg
PyPI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xiaomi-technology.jpeg
Xiaomi Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PyPI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xiaomi Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PyPI in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xiaomi Technology in 2025.

Incident History — PyPI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PyPI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xiaomi Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xiaomi Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pypi.jpeg
PyPI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xiaomi-technology.jpeg
Xiaomi Technology
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Interoperability application protocols
Motivation: Unauthorized access to victim devices
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Xiaomi Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PyPI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Xiaomi Technology company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PyPI company has not reported any.

In the current year, Xiaomi Technology company and PyPI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Xiaomi Technology company nor PyPI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xiaomi Technology company nor PyPI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xiaomi Technology company nor PyPI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Xiaomi Technology company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PyPI company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PyPI company nor Xiaomi Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Xiaomi Technology company employs more people globally than PyPI company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PyPI nor Xiaomi Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.