Comparison Overview

PyPI

VS

Booking.com

PyPI

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Python Package Index (PyPI) is a repository of software for the Python programming language

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Booking.com

Oosterdokskade 163, None, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1011 DL
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

A career at Booking.com is all about the journey, helping you explore new challenges in a place where you can be your best self. With plenty of exciting twists, turns and opportunities along the way. We’ve always been pioneers, on a mission to shape the future of travel through cutting edge technology, to make it easier for everyone to enjoy amazing experiences wherever they go. Under a desert sky, or in the heart of a bustling city. Discovering the perfect hideaway, or the perfect paella. When you join us, you’ll be part of a community where taking a different path and trying something new is celebrated and supported. And where making a difference counts. We’re determined to make the world of travel more sustainable, more accessible, and more inclusive, to create a positive impact on a global scale. That’s why we’re always looking for people who search for better solutions, the ones eager to stray off the beaten path to find new ways of doing things. Because at Booking.com it’s more than a job, it’s a journey we’re on together.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15,885
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pypi.jpeg
PyPI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/booking.com.jpeg
Booking.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PyPI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Booking.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PyPI in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Booking.com has 581.82% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — PyPI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PyPI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Booking.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Booking.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pypi.jpeg
PyPI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/booking.com.jpeg
Booking.com
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Mass-phishing, Infostealer trojans
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: compromised email accounts, phishing links, fake reCAPTCHA challenge, malware download (PureRAT), personalized WhatsApp messages, fake Booking/Expedia websites
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, fraudulent transactions
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: malicious domain registration, social engineering, phishing emails/websites
Motivation: financial gain, theft of payment details
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Booking.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PyPI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Booking.com company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PyPI company has not reported any.

In the current year, Booking.com company has reported more cyber incidents than PyPI company.

Neither Booking.com company nor PyPI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Booking.com company nor PyPI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Booking.com company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PyPI company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PyPI company nor Booking.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Booking.com company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PyPI company.

Booking.com company employs more people globally than PyPI company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PyPI nor Booking.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.