Comparison Overview

PwC Acceleration Centers

VS

Mercer

PwC Acceleration Centers

., OO
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

PwC Acceleration Centers (ACs), formerly Service Delivery Centers, are diverse, global talent hubs focused on delivering value to our clients – working with global client engagement teams across the PwC network. Driving new digital ways of working, ACs help unlock new opportunities for our people, organization and clients through competency enhancement, collaboration, automation, quality, innovation and integrated global delivery. Our Acceleration Centers span 11 cities and seven countries, and provide virtual client engagement support around the world and across all of PwC’s services and capabilities. Professionals in our innovative Acceleration Centers (ACs) are part of inclusive teams who work together across functions and geographies; engage in challenging projects; and provide distinctive services to support client engagements through enhanced quality and innovation. A role in our Acceleration Centers will provide growth potential and valuable learning opportunities.

NAICS: 54
NAICS Definition: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees: 13,838
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mercer

New York, New York, New York, NY, 10036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

At Mercer, we believe in building brighter futures. Together, our 25,000 employees in over 130 counties are helping redefine the future of work, reshape retirement and investment outcomes, and unlock real health and well-being. For over 75 years, we’ve provided trusted advice and solutions to build healthier and more sustainable futures for our clients, colleagues and communities. Balancing economics and empathy in our approach, we work side by side with you to find solutions to benefit your people and your business. By turning ideas into actions that spark positive change, we help you enrich employees’ lives and careers and drive innovation, progress and performance. Mercer is a business of Marsh McLennan. Get to know us better: Click the “learn more” button at the top of the page to discover everything we do to help you meet the needs of today and tomorrow. Follow us on Twitter at @Mercer.

NAICS: 54
NAICS Definition: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees: 23,248
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwc-acceleration-centers.jpeg
PwC Acceleration Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercer.jpeg
Mercer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PwC Acceleration Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mercer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC Acceleration Centers in 2025.

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercer in 2025.

Incident History — PwC Acceleration Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC Acceleration Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mercer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwc-acceleration-centers.jpeg
PwC Acceleration Centers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercer.jpeg
Mercer
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mercer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PwC Acceleration Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mercer company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PwC Acceleration Centers company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mercer company and PwC Acceleration Centers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mercer company nor PwC Acceleration Centers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Mercer company has disclosed at least one data breach, while PwC Acceleration Centers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mercer company nor PwC Acceleration Centers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers company nor Mercer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mercer company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PwC Acceleration Centers company.

Mercer company employs more people globally than PwC Acceleration Centers company, reflecting its scale as a Professional Services.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PwC Acceleration Centers nor Mercer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H