Comparison Overview

Pure Pack Technologies

VS

Fallen Arrows

Pure Pack Technologies

5417 South 37th Street, Phoenix, Arizona, 85040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.purepacktechnologies.com

Pure Pack Technologies is a flexible packaging company dedicated to customer service and high quality standards. Pure Pack Technologies can meet all your flexible packaging needs for almost any industry including the snack food industry, beverage, health and beauty, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, pet food, meat packing and more. We have the latest technologies, equipment and an operating staff with over 40 years combined experience to give you the confidence your job will be delivered on time and to your specifications.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fallen Arrows

840 dekalb ave, atlanta, Georgia, 30307, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fallenarrows.com

Fallen Arrows is a direct-to-garment printshop and a growing community of artists, designers, thinkers, and doers. If you combined a clothing company, a hippie commune, and a revolutionary army, it would look a lot like Fallen Arrows. We're flexible by design, independent by choice, and devoted to service. We serve everyone we come into contact with: the artists we promote and produce clothing and canvas prints for, the customers we provide unique and high-quality products for, and the employees who make all this possible. Fallen Arrows is dedicated to proving that capitalism is not evil. We're built on a win-win-win situation: our customers get amazing custom clothing and canvas prints, our artists get great promotion and real income from their work, and our employees get to learn all aspects of the business in a positive and engaging work environment. Profit without greed is possible and we're living that every day. Our printer works like an inkjet for fabric, which means your designs can be complex and full of color, and the image will feel like a part of the garment. We don't require a minimum order, and we're happy to print samples for you before you commit to a full order.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pure-pack-technologies.jpeg
Pure Pack Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallen-arrows.jpeg
Fallen Arrows
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pure Pack Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fallen Arrows
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pure Pack Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fallen Arrows in 2025.

Incident History — Pure Pack Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pure Pack Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fallen Arrows (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fallen Arrows cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pure-pack-technologies.jpeg
Pure Pack Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallen-arrows.jpeg
Fallen Arrows
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pure Pack Technologies company and Fallen Arrows company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fallen Arrows company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pure Pack Technologies company.

In the current year, Fallen Arrows company and Pure Pack Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fallen Arrows company nor Pure Pack Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fallen Arrows company nor Pure Pack Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fallen Arrows company nor Pure Pack Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies company nor Fallen Arrows company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies company nor Fallen Arrows company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pure Pack Technologies company employs more people globally than Fallen Arrows company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pure Pack Technologies nor Fallen Arrows holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References