Comparison Overview

Pura Vida Farms, LLC

VS

Genting Plantations

Pura Vida Farms, LLC

910 E. Birch St. , Brea, CA, 92821, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Pura Vida is not just our name. Pura Vida is a Costa Rican saying meaning โ€œpure lifeโ€ or basically, life is good! Pura Vida is more than a name โ€“ itโ€™s our motto. It filters throughout all that we do, to our products, our farms, our customers, our service and our employees. And our goal is to bring a little piece of that good life from our farms to your table. We are based in Brea, CA, serving as a grower, shipper and importer of fresh pineapple, watermelon, cantaloupe, honeydew and specialty melon products. With growing locations across the United States and in Costa Rica, we can grow our fruits in the best environment possible throughout different seasons of the year. We grow our melon products right here in the United States and our superior pineapple operation is located in Costa Rica to produce a year round supply of incredibly golden, sweet fruit.

NAICS: 111
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Genting Plantations

10th Floor, Wisma Genting, Jalan Sultan Ismail Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur 50250, MY
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Genting Plantations Berhad (197701003946 (34993-X)) commenced operations in 1980 as the plantation arm of Genting Berhad. Having gained a listing on Bursa Malaysia on 30 August 1982, Genting Plantations Berhad has grown to become one of the Malaysia's leading oil palm plantation companies, with interests extending to property development and biotechnology. Our Core Businesses: Plantation Division Genting Plantations' operations consist of oil palm estates and palm oil mills spread over Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, and Indonesia. The Group's landbank in Malaysia has increased substantially over the years to about 66,000 hectares. Genting Plantations has established a significant presence in Indonesia, where it is currently developing 162,000 hectares of land for oil palm cultivation through joint ventures. Genting Plantations also owns 9 oil mills in Malaysia and Indonesia, with combined milling capacity of 405 metric tonnes per hour, and downstream manufacturing facilities. As a member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), it is committed to the sustainable production of palm oil. Property Division Genting Plantations is involved in the development of quality residential and commercial projects aimed at unlocking the value of its vast landbank in Malaysia. Since venturing into property development in the 1990s, Genting Plantations has embarked on four projects covering the states of Kedah, Melaka, and Johor. AgTech Division Genting Plantations, an advocate of scientific advancement, has positioned itself at the forefront of cutting-edge research in crop improvement, with the set-up of its subsidiaries, namely ACGT Sdn Bhd ("ACGT") and Genting Green Tech Sdn Bhd ("GGT"). The development and commercialisation of genomics-based solutions by both ACGT and GGT are poised to revolutionise the dynamics of crop productivity and value enhancement.

NAICS: 111
NAICS Definition: Crop Production
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pura-vida-farms.jpeg
Pura Vida Farms, LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genting-plantations.jpeg
Genting Plantations
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pura Vida Farms, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Genting Plantations
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Farming Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pura Vida Farms, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Farming Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genting Plantations in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pura Vida Farms, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pura Vida Farms, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Genting Plantations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genting Plantations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pura-vida-farms.jpeg
Pura Vida Farms, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genting-plantations.jpeg
Genting Plantations
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pura Vida Farms, LLC company and Genting Plantations company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Genting Plantations company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pura Vida Farms, LLC company.

In the current year, Genting Plantations company and Pura Vida Farms, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Genting Plantations company nor Pura Vida Farms, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Genting Plantations company nor Pura Vida Farms, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Genting Plantations company nor Pura Vida Farms, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pura Vida Farms, LLC company nor Genting Plantations company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pura Vida Farms, LLC company nor Genting Plantations company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pura Vida Farms, LLC company employs more people globally than Genting Plantations company, reflecting its scale as a Farming.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N