Comparison Overview

PulseTV.com

VS

Fragrance.com

PulseTV.com

Tinley Park, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
pulsetv.com

PulseTV is one of the most innovative eCommerce or Online Retailers around, founded in 1996. We've adapted many times over the years, most notably marketing utilizing video produced from our in-house studio. Our products range from As Seen on TV items, mid-to-high-end electronics, housewares, auto accessories and more. Our goals: • Offer a wide assortment of products at a good value • Create a shopping experience that is simple and easy to use • Assist customers quickly and efficiently with responsive customer service

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Fragrance.com

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.Fragrance.com

Fragrance.com was created to provide the public with access to the largest inventory of genuine, brand name fragrances, skincare, candles, aromatherapy and more at the lowest possible prices. (Stock Symbol: FGNT.PK)

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulsetv-com.jpeg
PulseTV.com
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fragrance.com.jpeg
Fragrance.com
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PulseTV.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fragrance.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PulseTV.com in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fragrance.com in 2025.

Incident History — PulseTV.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PulseTV.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fragrance.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fragrance.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulsetv-com.jpeg
PulseTV.com
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fragrance.com.jpeg
Fragrance.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fragrance.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PulseTV.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PulseTV.com company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Fragrance.com company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fragrance.com company and PulseTV.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fragrance.com company nor PulseTV.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PulseTV.com company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Fragrance.com company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fragrance.com company nor PulseTV.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PulseTV.com company nor Fragrance.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fragrance.com company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PulseTV.com company.

Fragrance.com company employs more people globally than PulseTV.com company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PulseTV.com nor Fragrance.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References