Comparison Overview

PULP Printhouse

VS

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company

PULP Printhouse

1706 West State Street, Bristol, TN, 37620, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

PULP is a new breed of marketing company, built from the ground up to work alongside your company’s internal marketing department and with your traditional advertising agency to form a virtual “marketing superteam.” On this team, we carry the ball that strengthens your brand by weaving stories about your products and services. We combine logic and magic to educate and captivate your audience. We tell these stories across multiple channels, including social, to create communities of brand followers and word of mouth evangelists.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company

9900 Pflumm rd suite 29, Lenexa, KS, 66215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Brightmarks, LLC is a print enhancement company focused on providing our customer a return on print investment that is unmatched by typical commercial printers. Most commercial printer assets are in place to put ink on paper. They then broker the finishing work, often resulting in multiple vendors and multiple markups. At Brightmarks, LLC. our machinery is in place to finish the print job while brokering the print. Although there are hundreds of printers to choose from, we have meticulously selected a handful who have demonstrated their market leading ability to put ink on paper correctly and on time! Since so much of the cost of a print job is in the finishing, we substantially lower the cost of the job by eliminating multiple companies handling your project. We also significantly raise the quality of the finished piece because it is not handled by multiple vendors. The printed press sheets are finished, in house, under one roof by one company! follow us on Twitter - @brightmarks

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulp-printhouse.jpeg
PULP Printhouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightmarks-llc..jpeg
BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PULP Printhouse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PULP Printhouse in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company in 2025.

Incident History — PULP Printhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PULP Printhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulp-printhouse.jpeg
PULP Printhouse
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightmarks-llc..jpeg
BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PULP Printhouse company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PULP Printhouse company.

In the current year, BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company and PULP Printhouse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company nor PULP Printhouse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company nor PULP Printhouse company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company nor PULP Printhouse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PULP Printhouse company nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PULP Printhouse company nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PULP Printhouse company employs more people globally than BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PULP Printhouse nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N