Comparison Overview

Pulone.com

VS

Sclafani Williams Court Reporters

Pulone.com

1550 The Alameda, Suite 150, San Jose, CA 95126, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For over three decades, Pulone Reporting Services has been the go-to source for first-rate court reporting and litigation support. Today, while one of the oldest firms in the industry we are also a 21st century firm leveraging technology: we work with any device, can connect multiple locations, use realtime technology, stream over the internet, and can deliver testimony instantaneously. Your cases are important, and so is the knowledge to correctly notate what is said. Pulone has been active in professional and legislative efforts which govern our industry for decades. Our reporters average 23+ years experience, and several with more than 30 years’ experience.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sclafani Williams Court Reporters

402 South Kentucky Avenue, Lakeland, Florida, 33801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Sclafani Williams Court Reporters is a Florida Court Reporter company serving the legal industry in Central Florida and beyond. Our expert network of reporters uses state-of-the-art technology to provide you with realtime deposition reporting, compressed transcripts, indexing, videotaping services and worldwide videoconferencing of your proceedings. With five fully-staffed court reporter offices, Sclafani Williams has satellite offices all across Central Florida from Clearwater in the west, to Daytona Beach in the east. A certified Women's Business Enterprise (WBENC), is privately owned and In these days of decentralization and anonymity, we are proud of our family history in the field of Court Reporting and will continue its tradition of quality service and dedication.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulone-com.jpeg
Pulone.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sclafani-williams-court-reporters-inc-.jpeg
Sclafani Williams Court Reporters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pulone.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sclafani Williams Court Reporters
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pulone.com in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sclafani Williams Court Reporters in 2025.

Incident History — Pulone.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pulone.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sclafani Williams Court Reporters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sclafani Williams Court Reporters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulone-com.jpeg
Pulone.com
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sclafani-williams-court-reporters-inc-.jpeg
Sclafani Williams Court Reporters
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pulone.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pulone.com company.

In the current year, Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company and Pulone.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company nor Pulone.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company nor Pulone.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company nor Pulone.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pulone.com company nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pulone.com company.

Sclafani Williams Court Reporters company employs more people globally than Pulone.com company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pulone.com nor Sclafani Williams Court Reporters holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X