Comparison Overview

Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C.

VS

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC

Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C.

180 N. LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL, 60601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

25th Anniversary Announcement: We are proud to announce that Pugh, Jones & Johnson celebrated twenty-five years of service to its clients and community on October 7th, 2016! Founded in 1991 by our three managing partners, Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. (PJJ) was established as a litigation and transactional law firm with a reputation for excellence among its clients and within the legal community. Today, we are a firm of 18 attorneys based in Chicago and New York. We represent a diverse client base consisting of publicly and privately held corporations, government entities, educational and financial institutions, healthcare providers and entrepreneurs. We are one of the largest minority-owned law firms in the Midwest. Our team includes attorneys from: * Fortune 50 and AMLaw 100 Law Firms * United States Department of Justice * United States Attorney's Office * National Labor Relations Board * City of Chicago Corporation Counsel's Office * Chicago Housing Authority * Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor * New York Attorney General's Office * New York State Organized Crime Task Force

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC

875 N Michigan Ave., #3216, Chicago, IL, 60611-1960, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For over 35 years now John R. Crossan has helped businesses, institutions, and individuals thrive and compete successfully with services provided by his specialized practice of Intellectual Property Law - shortened as IP Law. John R. Crossan has, with his clients, obtained and enforced or protected against patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, and John R. Crossan has helped clients understand and use employment covenants and IP-related antitrust law. He has done this through litigation in Federal and state courts and other dispute resolution forums, here and abroad, through preparing and prosecuting applications, by negotiations and licensing, and through counseling of clients of all sizes.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pugh-jones-&-johnson-p-c-.jpeg
Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossan-ip-law-llc.jpeg
Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pugh-jones-&-johnson-p-c-.jpeg
Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossan-ip-law-llc.jpeg
Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company.

In the current year, Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company and Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company nor Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company nor Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company nor Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. company employs more people globally than Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pugh, Jones & Johnson, P.C. nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X