Comparison Overview

Publishizer

VS

Scan Client Publishing

Publishizer

17629 88th Avenue, Coopersville, MI, 49404, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://publishizer.com

Publishizer uses reader data and pre-orders to get more books discovered by traditional publishers and provide more agency to authors. Recent credits: Arthritis Foodie by Emily Johnson (Hachette UK), Experience The Revolution by Derek Loudermilk (Wiley UK), Modern Tribe by Al Jeffery (Hay House AUS), The Age of Influence by Neal Schaffer (HarperCollins US), Good Talk by Daniel Stillman (Boom NL), The Halo Effect by Jack Bobo (Mango US), Felicity Aston (Penguin), Chris Lynam (Simon & Schuster). Since our launch in 2015, we've launched more than 1,200 author crowdfunding campaigns for 200 publishing partners, that have raised over US $2,900,000 in support, from a community of 60,000 people in 158 locations across the world.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Scan Client Publishing

News Building, 3 London Bridge Street, London, undefined, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.scanclientpublishing.com

Scan Client Publishing Trading since 2008, the company has experienced rapid growth and is currently on a continued path of expansion. The venture began with the launch of Scan Magazine which was rapidly followed by the launch of consumer shows at Earls Court and Olympia. Today the company operates a portfolio of magazines, events, market research and lead generation business. Our philosophy is simply to expand constantly and enhance our current business portfolio by developing existing brands and launching dynamic new ventures.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/publishizer.jpeg
Publishizer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scan-magazine.jpeg
Scan Client Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Publishizer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scan Client Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Publishizer in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scan Client Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Publishizer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Publishizer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scan Client Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scan Client Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/publishizer.jpeg
Publishizer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scan-magazine.jpeg
Scan Client Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Publishizer company and Scan Client Publishing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Scan Client Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Publishizer company.

In the current year, Scan Client Publishing company and Publishizer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scan Client Publishing company nor Publishizer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scan Client Publishing company nor Publishizer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scan Client Publishing company nor Publishizer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Publishizer company nor Scan Client Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Publishizer company nor Scan Client Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scan Client Publishing company employs more people globally than Publishizer company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Publishizer nor Scan Client Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References