Comparison Overview

Publisher

VS

Cyberwolf

Publisher

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://odegardgroup.com

Odegard Group AG is a media group in Switzerland, founded in 2009 in Zug and based in Zürich. The current strategy is based not only on digital media but also on e-commerce and entertainment. It has a yearly income of approximately 1000 million CHF and over 3,200 employees in sixteen countries.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 806
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cyberwolf

undefined, undefined, undefined, 87505, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cyberwolf.com/

CyberWolf is dedicated to helping publishers grow by providing easy to use and cost-effective technology solutions that allow clients to focus on the business of publishing. Our ACUMEN Book® business management ERP system; PowerWeb Book® ecommerce platform; and, most recently, the CyberWolf Download Service™ (an Adobe Content Server DRM-enabled digital content distribution application) are used by a world-wide community of publishers to effectively compete in the modern publishing environment.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/publisher.jpeg
Publisher
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cyberwolf.jpeg
Cyberwolf
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Publisher
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cyberwolf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Publisher in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cyberwolf in 2025.

Incident History — Publisher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Publisher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cyberwolf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cyberwolf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/publisher.jpeg
Publisher
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cyberwolf.jpeg
Cyberwolf
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Publisher company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cyberwolf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cyberwolf company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Publisher company.

In the current year, Cyberwolf company and Publisher company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cyberwolf company nor Publisher company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cyberwolf company nor Publisher company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cyberwolf company nor Publisher company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Publisher company nor Cyberwolf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Publisher company nor Cyberwolf company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Publisher company employs more people globally than Cyberwolf company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Publisher nor Cyberwolf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References