Comparison Overview

Public Strategies Impact

VS

California State Association of Counties®

Public Strategies Impact

414 River View Plaza, Trenton, New Jersey, 08611-3420, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ◇◆◇ PUBLIC AFFAIRS ◇◆◇ ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT For more than 30 years, businesses in New Jersey and across the country have relied on Public Strategies Impact to represent their interests before the executive and legislative branches of the state government. We have grown to become one of the leading legislative advocacy organizations in New Jersey. As Public Strategies Impact has expanded, we have attracted talented veterans of government who have many years of experience in not only public service but in the political arena, including those who have held prominent positions in state and local government, campaign managers, and political advisors to governors. Our combined knowledge of government, public and community relations, media, finance, business, and law allow us to respond to any challenge and to position our clients in the best possible way. Visit njpsi.com for more information.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

California State Association of Counties®

undefined, Sacramento , California, 95814, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The California State Association of Counties (CSAC) serves as the effective advocate and unified voice of California's 58 counties. CSAC Mission To serve California counties by: developing and equipping county leaders to better serve their communities; effectively advocating and partnering with state and federal governments for appropriate policies, laws and funding; and communicating the value of the critical work being accomplished by county government.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-strategies-impact.jpeg
Public Strategies Impact
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-state-association-of-counties.jpeg
California State Association of Counties®
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Public Strategies Impact
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
California State Association of Counties®
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Strategies Impact in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California State Association of Counties® in 2025.

Incident History — Public Strategies Impact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Strategies Impact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — California State Association of Counties® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California State Association of Counties® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-strategies-impact.jpeg
Public Strategies Impact
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-state-association-of-counties.jpeg
California State Association of Counties®
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Strategies Impact company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California State Association of Counties® company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, California State Association of Counties® company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Public Strategies Impact company.

In the current year, California State Association of Counties® company and Public Strategies Impact company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither California State Association of Counties® company nor Public Strategies Impact company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither California State Association of Counties® company nor Public Strategies Impact company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither California State Association of Counties® company nor Public Strategies Impact company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Public Strategies Impact company nor California State Association of Counties® company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Public Strategies Impact company nor California State Association of Counties® company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

California State Association of Counties® company employs more people globally than Public Strategies Impact company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Public Strategies Impact nor California State Association of Counties® holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N