Comparison Overview

Public Policy Forum

VS

National Maritime Foundation- NMF

Public Policy Forum

1400 - 130 Albert Street, Ottawa, Ontario, CA, K1P 5G4
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

For almost four decades, the Public Policy Forum (PPF) has been bringing together Canada’s leading experts from across sectors, provinces, territories and First Nations communities to create good policy for a better Canada. We are passionate in our belief that putting this diverse set of perspectives at the centre of policy discussions creates representative, resilient policy. As an independent, non-partisan think tank, PPF works to ensure Canada’s inclusive growth and strategic competitiveness by addressing the country’s most pressing policy challenges, including the energy transition and climate policy, health security and health-care system reform, Indigenous economic reconciliation, democracy and good governance.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Maritime Foundation- NMF

NOM Varuna Complex, Airport Road NH-48, , None, New Delhi, None, IN, 110 010
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

India’s sole think-tank that concentrates, with unwavering focus, upon the entire gamut of subjects and disciplines relevant to the maritime domain. As a serious think-tank, the NMF undertakes intellectual, academic and interactive activities related to research, advocacy, and convening. It also has a vibrant and growing university-outreach programme that seeks to enhance maritime awareness amongst the youth and identify and further schemes and disciplines leading to skill-development and job-creation within the maritime domain.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-policy-forum.jpeg
Public Policy Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-maritime-foundation.jpeg
National Maritime Foundation- NMF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Public Policy Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Maritime Foundation- NMF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Policy Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Maritime Foundation- NMF in 2025.

Incident History — Public Policy Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Policy Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Maritime Foundation- NMF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Maritime Foundation- NMF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-policy-forum.jpeg
Public Policy Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-maritime-foundation.jpeg
National Maritime Foundation- NMF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Policy Forum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Maritime Foundation- NMF company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Maritime Foundation- NMF company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Public Policy Forum company.

In the current year, National Maritime Foundation- NMF company and Public Policy Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Maritime Foundation- NMF company nor Public Policy Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Maritime Foundation- NMF company nor Public Policy Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Maritime Foundation- NMF company nor Public Policy Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Public Policy Forum company nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Public Policy Forum company nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Public Policy Forum company and National Maritime Foundation- NMF company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Public Policy Forum nor National Maritime Foundation- NMF holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X