Comparison Overview

Public Law Project

VS

ACLU of North Carolina

Public Law Project

93-99 Goswell Road, London, EC1V 7EY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We seek a world in which individual rights are respected and public bodies act fairly and lawfully. We improve public decision-making and facilitate access to justice. Our priorities are to: > Promote and preserve the Rule of Law > Ensure fair systems > Improve access to justice

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ACLU of North Carolina

Raleigh, North Carolina, US, Raleigh, North Carolina, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

For more than 50 years, the ACLU of North Carolina has been our state's guardian of liberty, working in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the North Carolina Constitution and the US Constitution. Whether it’s achieving full equality for LGBTQ people and fighting against House Bill 2, establishing new privacy protections for our digital age of widespread government surveillance, working with communities to stop racially-biased policing, expanding reproductive freedom, or defending voting rights, the ACLU takes up the toughest civil liberties cases and issues to defend all people from government abuse and overreach..

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-law-project.jpeg
Public Law Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aclu-of-north-carolina.jpeg
ACLU of North Carolina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Public Law Project
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ACLU of North Carolina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Law Project in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACLU of North Carolina in 2025.

Incident History — Public Law Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Law Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ACLU of North Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACLU of North Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-law-project.jpeg
Public Law Project
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aclu-of-north-carolina.jpeg
ACLU of North Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ACLU of North Carolina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Public Law Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ACLU of North Carolina company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Public Law Project company.

In the current year, ACLU of North Carolina company and Public Law Project company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ACLU of North Carolina company nor Public Law Project company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ACLU of North Carolina company nor Public Law Project company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ACLU of North Carolina company nor Public Law Project company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Public Law Project company nor ACLU of North Carolina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Public Law Project company nor ACLU of North Carolina company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ACLU of North Carolina company employs more people globally than Public Law Project company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Public Law Project nor ACLU of North Carolina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X