Comparison Overview

Public Good Initiative

VS

Rural Municipalities of Alberta

Public Good Initiative

14 Queen's Park Crescent W, Toronto, M5S 3K9, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Public Good Initiative (PGI) is a graduate student-led pro-bono consulting organization at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. Our student consultants are matched with non-profit organizations and play a vital role in supporting projects from beginning to end. Consultants gain real-world experience working with clients while learning valuable skills to help prepare them for a career in public policy. PGI's mission is to make a positive contribution to the policy capacity of the not-for-profit sector. Consultants provide a variety of services including project design, management, and implementation of policy, internal governance and regulations, and research to support not-for-profits as they navigate complex issues.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rural Municipalities of Alberta

2510 Sparrow Drive, Nisku, Alberta, T9E 8N5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The Rural Municipalities of Alberta (RMA) is a progressive, independent association committed to meeting the diverse and changing needs of Alberta’s 69 counties and municipal districts. Since 1909, the RMA has helped rural municipalities achieve strong, effective local government through advocacy and business services. On behalf of our members, our advocacy team works closely with key stakeholders to ensure that provincial and federal decision-makers, industry, and other relevant parties understand and incorporate rural Alberta’s best interests in their policies. We also offer business services to our members, including cooperative procurement programs through the Canoe Procurement Group of Canada and insurance through RMA Insurance.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-good-initiative.jpeg
Public Good Initiative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alberta-association-of-municipal-districts-and-counties.jpeg
Rural Municipalities of Alberta
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Public Good Initiative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rural Municipalities of Alberta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Good Initiative in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rural Municipalities of Alberta in 2025.

Incident History — Public Good Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Good Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rural Municipalities of Alberta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rural Municipalities of Alberta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-good-initiative.jpeg
Public Good Initiative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alberta-association-of-municipal-districts-and-counties.jpeg
Rural Municipalities of Alberta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rural Municipalities of Alberta company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Public Good Initiative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rural Municipalities of Alberta company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Public Good Initiative company.

In the current year, Rural Municipalities of Alberta company and Public Good Initiative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta company nor Public Good Initiative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta company nor Public Good Initiative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta company nor Public Good Initiative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Public Good Initiative company nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Public Good Initiative company nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rural Municipalities of Alberta company employs more people globally than Public Good Initiative company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Public Good Initiative nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H