Comparison Overview

PT. Pegadaian

VS

LPL Financial

PT. Pegadaian

Jl. Kramat Raya 162, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, ID, 10430
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pegadaian.co.id

PT Pegadaian didirikan di kota Sukabumi, Jawa Barat pada 1 April 1901. Tak hanya bergerak di Industri Gadai, Pegadaian juga memiliki ragam produk dan layanan seperti investasi berbasis emas yang dapat dimiliki oleh masyarakat dengan cara yang mudah, diantaranya Tabungan Emas, Cicil Emas dan Arisan Emas. Sementara untuk produk pembiayaan, Pegadaian menyediakan produk pembiayaan Haji dan Umroh, Kredit Mikro, Kredit Kendaraan hingga KUR Syariah. Tergabung dalam Holding Ultra Mikro pada 2021, Pegadaian bersama BRI dan PNM berkomitmen dalam mendukung UMKM untuk naik kelas. Pegadaian juga merupakan lembaga pembiayaan sosial yang berkomitmen untuk memberdayakan masyarakat melalui layanan keuangan inklusif. Dengan berbagai inovasi layanan dan program sosial, Pegadaian terus berupaya menciptakan dampak positif bagi komunitas dan masyarakat secara luas. Pada Desember 2024, Pegadaian resmi menjadi pelopor usaha Bulion dengan mengantongi izin yang dikeluarkan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), melalui surat Persetujuan Penyelenggaraan Kegiatan Usaha Bulion PT Pegadaian. Melalui surat tersebut, Pegadaian dapat melakukan kegiatan usaha Layanan Bank Emas Pegadaian yang meliputi Deposito Emas, Pinjaman Modal Kerja Emas, Jasa Titipan Emas Korporasi maupun Perdagangan Emas. Produk dan layanan Pegadaian dapat diakses baik secara konvensional maupun digital melalui aplikasi Pegadaian Digital yang dapat di unduh melalui AppStore maupun PlayStore. Untuk informasi lebih lanjut kunjungi www.pegadaian.co.id

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,915
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LPL Financial

4707 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA, US, 92121-1968
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lpl.com/

LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: LPLA) is among the fastest growing wealth management firms in the U.S. As a leader in the financial advisor-mediated marketplace, LPL supports over 29,000 financial advisors and the wealth management practices of approximately 1,100 financial institutions, servicing and custodying approximately $1.9 trillion in brokerage and advisory assets on behalf of approximately 7 million Americans. The firm provides a wide range of advisor affiliation models, investment solutions, fintech tools and practice management services, ensuring that advisors and institutions have the flexibility to choose the business model, services, and technology resources they need to run thriving businesses.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14,111
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ptpegadaian.jpeg
PT. Pegadaian
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpl-financial.jpeg
LPL Financial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PT. Pegadaian
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LPL Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT. Pegadaian in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LPL Financial in 2025.

Incident History — PT. Pegadaian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT. Pegadaian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LPL Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPL Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ptpegadaian.jpeg
PT. Pegadaian
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpl-financial.jpeg
LPL Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Email Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2012
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Employee's Desktop Computer
Blog: Blog

FAQ

PT. Pegadaian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LPL Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LPL Financial company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PT. Pegadaian company has not reported any.

In the current year, LPL Financial company and PT. Pegadaian company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LPL Financial company nor PT. Pegadaian company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

LPL Financial company has disclosed at least one data breach, while PT. Pegadaian company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LPL Financial company nor PT. Pegadaian company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PT. Pegadaian company nor LPL Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LPL Financial company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT. Pegadaian company.

LPL Financial company employs more people globally than PT. Pegadaian company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PT. Pegadaian nor LPL Financial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References