Comparison Overview

PT PLN (Persero)

VS

Enel Group

PT PLN (Persero)

Jl. Trunojoyo Blok M I/135, Jakarta Selatan, Jakarta, 12160, ID
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pln.co.id

Indonesia State Electricity Corporation PLN has a long history in electricity industry of Indonesia. As the sole provider of electricity in Indonesia, PLN is striving to increase quality of services to all Indonesian. In 1972, in accordance with Government Regulation No.17, the State-owned Electricity Company was enacted as a State-owned General Electricity Company and as PKUK responsible to provide electricity to meet public needs. While the Government policy was giving opportunity to the Private Sectors to focus on the provision of electricity, the status of PLN was changed from a General Company to Corporation’ as well as PKUK in providing electricity for public needs until the present. Throughout the 75 years of journey, PT PLN (Persero) has succeeded in becoming one of the companies with the largest assets in Indonesia of IDR 1,589 Trillion (PT PLN (Persero) Financial Report 2020 Audited).

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 22,729
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Enel Group

Viale Regina Margherita 125, None, Rome, Italy, IT, 00198
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.enel.com

We are a multinational company changing the face of energy, one of the world’s leading integrated utilities. As the largest private player in producing clean energy with renewable sources we have more than 88 GW of total capacity, including around 64 GW of renewables. Distributing electricity through a network of 1.9 million kilometers to 69 million end users, being the first private network operator globally, and proudly bringing energy to approximately 58 million homes and businesses. People are the heart of our energy: our Group is made up of more than 60,000 people operating in 28 countries and our work is based on our values of Trust, Innovation, Proactivity, Flexibility and Respect. Diversity and inclusion play a key role for us, leading to our being recognized in all three of the most prestigious indices and rankings that assess corporate performance on gender diversity at the workplace and beyond: the Refinitive Diversity Inclusion Index, the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index, and the Equileap Gender Equality Global Report & Ranking. Let’s shape the energy of the future together.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 29,573
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enelgroup.jpeg
Enel Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PT PLN (Persero)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Enel Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT PLN (Persero) in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enel Group in 2025.

Incident History — PT PLN (Persero) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT PLN (Persero) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Enel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enelgroup.jpeg
Enel Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Enel Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT PLN (Persero) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Enel Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PT PLN (Persero) company.

In the current year, Enel Group company and PT PLN (Persero) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Enel Group company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Enel Group company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Enel Group company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Enel Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Enel Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT PLN (Persero) company.

Enel Group company employs more people globally than PT PLN (Persero) company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) nor Enel Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References