Comparison Overview

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

VS

Electrolux Group

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

Jakarta, 12910, ID
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Over a number of decades PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk has been progressively transformed to become a Total Food Solutions company with operations in all stages of food manufacturing from the production of raw materials and their processing through to consumer products in the market. Today, it is renowned as a well–established company & a leading player in each category of business in which it operates. In its business operations, Indofood capitalizes on its resilient business model with 4 complementary Strategic Business Groups : Consumer Branded Products (CBP). Indofood CBP is one of the leading packaged food producers in Indonesia, with a wide range of packaged food products. ICBP product brands are among the strongest brands with the most significant mind share in Indonesia for consumer food brands. Bogasari, primarily a producer of wheat flour as well as pasta. Its business operations are supported by shipping and packaging units. Agribusiness. The Group’s principal business activities range from research and development, seed breeding, oil palm cultivation and milling; as well as the production & marketing of branded cooking oils, margarine and shortening. In addition, the Group is also involved in the cultivation and processing of rubber and sugar cane as well as other crops. Distribution, which boasts the most extensive distribution network in Indonesia, distributes the majority of Indofood’s and its subsidiaries’ consumer products as well as third–party products. Cultivation and Processed Vegetables activities are conducted by China Minzhong Food Corporation Limited (“CMFC”) which is listed on the SGX and is an integrated vegetable processing company in the People’s Republic of China. Through its decades of experience CMFC has developed an integrated demand-driven operation with wide-ranging cultivation and processing capabilities. In addition, CMFC also has a branded products operation.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 17,134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Electrolux Group

Electrolux - Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, SE-10545
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Electrolux Group is a leading global appliance company that has shaped living for the better for more than 100 years. We reinvent taste, care and wellbeing experiences for millions of people, always striving to be at the forefront of sustainability in society through our solutions and operations. Under our group of leading appliance brands, including Electrolux, AEG and Frigidaire, we sell household products in around 120 markets every year. In 2024 Electrolux Group had sales of SEK 136 billion and employed approximately 41,000 people around the world. For more information go to www.electroluxgroup.com Comment moderation guidelines: We welcome open, respectful and constructive conversation on this page. At Electrolux Group, our values of respect, dignity and courtesy guide how we engage online, and we ask that all contributions align with these principles and LinkedIn’s Community Guidelines and User Agreement. To ensure a safe and inclusive environment, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, offensive, disruptive, misleading or false, repetitive or off-topic. We may also block or report users who repeatedly violate these guidelines. Please note that comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of Electrolux Group.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 30,968
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-indofood-sukses-makmur-tbk.jpeg
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electroluxgroup.jpeg
Electrolux Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electrolux Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Group in 2026.

Incident History — PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electrolux Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-indofood-sukses-makmur-tbk.jpeg
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electroluxgroup.jpeg
Electrolux Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Electrolux Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Electrolux Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company.

In the current year, Electrolux Group company and PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor Electrolux Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Electrolux Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company.

Electrolux Group company employs more people globally than PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk nor Electrolux Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N