Comparison Overview

pt Design

VS

Traveling Dragon Studio

pt Design

Trench, Telford, TF2 6QB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Graphic & Website Design Specialists, we also help to Market you and your company by helping you reach bigger crowds! We design anything from banner design to web design.. These can start with 2-3 pages and increase over time. Take a look at our portfolio on our website www.pt-design.co.uk We also specialise in Social Media Marketing.. This can help to raise attendance at Paid events, raise Company profile and increase the reach..

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Traveling Dragon Studio

Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

My Mission: to create imaginatively truthful and inclusive illustration, especially for children’s books & media; to lead mural projects that build community and celebrate diverse cultures; and to lead art classes, retreats, and coaching sessions that promote exploration & self-acceptance for my students/clients, that unleashes their inner magic, empowering them to stand strong in their authentic selves.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-design.jpeg
pt Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magic-hand-studio.jpeg
Traveling Dragon Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
pt Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Traveling Dragon Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for pt Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Traveling Dragon Studio in 2025.

Incident History — pt Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

pt Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Traveling Dragon Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Traveling Dragon Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-design.jpeg
pt Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magic-hand-studio.jpeg
Traveling Dragon Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Traveling Dragon Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to pt Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Traveling Dragon Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to pt Design company.

In the current year, Traveling Dragon Studio company and pt Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Traveling Dragon Studio company nor pt Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Traveling Dragon Studio company nor pt Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Traveling Dragon Studio company nor pt Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither pt Design company nor Traveling Dragon Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither pt Design company nor Traveling Dragon Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

pt Design company employs more people globally than Traveling Dragon Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither pt Design nor Traveling Dragon Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X