Comparison Overview

PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

VS

National Bank of Egypt (NBE)

PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Jalan Jenderal Sudirman No 44-46, Jakarta Pusat, 10210, ID
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) adalah salah satu bank milik pemerintah yang terbesar di Indonesia. BRI didirikan di Purwokerto, Jawa Tengah oleh Raden Bei Aria Wirjaatmadja pada 16 Desember 1895. BRI telah hadir lebih dari 129 tahun memberi pelayanan terbaik bagi seluruh lapisan masyarakat, BRI turut andil dalam upaya membangun negeri dan Memberi Makna Indonesia. Didukung oleh 8.200 lebih jaringan kantor, 686,128 jaringan e-channel, 1.064.219 Agen BRILink serta jaringan satelit BRIsat, membuat BRI terus berusaha menjadi yang pertama dalam mendukung perekonomian masyarakat. Melalui visi "The Most Trusted Lifetime Financial Partner for Sustainable Growth” menjadikan BRI fokus pada pengembangan SDM unggul, berkarakter kuat, dan ber-AKHLAK. Sebagai bentuk komitmen BRI dalam memberikan economic value bagi Negara, tahun 2024 BRI telah memberikan setoran Dividen terbesar diantara BUMN lainnya sebesar Rp. 25.1 Triliun. Kinerja BRI terus tumbuh dan berkelanjutan. Terbukti pada tahun 2024 BRI berhasil membukukan laba sebesar Rp60,64 Triliun dan menjadi Bank dengan laba terbesar di Indonesia. BRI tidak hanya tempat bekerja, tapi tempat kamu Belajar, Bertumbuh, dan Berkontribusi mengoptimalkan semua potensi terbaikmu untuk semua nasabah BRI. BRI dan Seluruh Insan BRILiaN, Siap Memberi Makna Indonesia.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 46,464
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Bank of Egypt (NBE)

1187 Cornish El Nile Street, Boulak, Cairo, undefined, EG
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Since its inception in 1898 with a capital of GBP1 million, NBE has been regarded as one of the oldest and most respected commercial banks in Egypt.Never isolated from national issues or concerns, NBE has been the primary supporter of Egypt’s national economy by financing the major Egyptian national projects. NBE’s missions and operations have continuously evolved throughout history and the economic and political changes experienced by the country.NBE was entrusted with issuing banknotes and handling government accounts, then in the 1950’s its activities evolved to undertaking the duties of the Central Bank. In the 1960’s it focused on commercial banking while still handling the central banking duties in locations where the Central Bank had no branches. Eventually, issuing and managing Investment Certificates for the State.NBE currently controls 23.6% of the market share of total assets in the Egyptian banking sector, 25.8% of total deposits, and 21.8% of total loans. NBE owns a large network includes over 337 branches, offices and banking units across the country, alongside an international presence through NBE (United Kingdom), NBE (Republic of the Sudan) and NBE’s branches in New York (United States of America) and Shanghai (People’s Republic of China), as well as representative offices in Johannesburg (South Africa), Dubai (United Arab Emirates), and Adis Ababa (Republic of Ethiopia), in addition to a branch in the Dubai International Finance Center.NBE also has a network of correspondents throughout the world, but centered in Europe— Egypt’s primary trade partner.NBE is always keen on an effective presence in brokerage, financing different sectors, and maintaining the client’s trust by offing the best and latest services.Whilst leading the local banking market,NBE is continuously upgrading its network of branches and channels of electronic communication, and strives to refine its human resources through advanced national and international training programs.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 25,164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-bank-rakyat-indonesia-persero-tbk.jpeg
PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-egypt.jpeg
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Bank of Egypt (NBE) in 2026.

Incident History — PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Bank of Egypt (NBE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Bank of Egypt (NBE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-bank-rakyat-indonesia-persero-tbk.jpeg
PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-egypt.jpeg
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company.

In the current year, National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company and PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company nor PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company nor PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company nor PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk company employs more people globally than National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N